Fashion
Latest Judgments
Total 1401 Consumer Court Cases Against Fashion.
The Director, Pearl Academy of Fashion V/S Neha Bansal
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sh. K.S.Arya, Adv. for appellant
Respondant Advocate Sh.Rakesh Chopra, Adv. for respondent no. 1, Service of OP 2 dispensed with.
The State Consumer Disputes Redressal CommissionUnion Territory,Chandigarh ,Plot No 5-B, Sector No 19B,Madhya Marg, Chandigarh-160 019FIRST APPEAL NO. 164 of 2010 1. Neha Bansald/o Sh. Jagdish Bansal r/o H.No. 555A, Sector 2, Panchkula ...........Appellant(s)Vs.1. The Director, P...
Case Number: 164
|
Date of Filing: 13-04-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
ALAPPAT FASHION JEWELLERY V/S DILEEPKUMAR.M
Court Name: Kozhikode
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
CC NO. 56 Of 20111. DILEEPKUMAR.MMANGALASSERY HOUSE,PATTALATH THAZHAM,POKKUNNU.PO.673013KOZHIKODEKERALA...........Complainant(s)Versus1. ALAPPAT FASHION JEWELLERYGALLERIA COMPLEX TRADECENTRE,MAVOOR ROAD, PO.PUTHIYARA,OPP.NEW BUSSTAND-673004.CALICUT............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:...
Case Number: 56
|
Date of Filing: 10-02-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK V/S KUVAM INTRNATIONAL FASHION LTD
Kotak Mahindra Bank Kotak Mahindra Bank Fashion Kotak
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate S G MAHAMUNI
Respondant Advocate Ashutosh Marathe
BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIComplaint Case No. CC/10/1261. KUVAM INTRNATIONAL FASHION LTD310 LAXMI SADAN ZAVER ROAD MULUND (W) MUMBAIMUMBAI MAHARASHTRA ...........Complainant(s)Versus1. KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK MAX L B S ROAD MUL...
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 10-08-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
M/s Cat Walk the Fashion Peeple V/S Mrs. Manorma Raj
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
CHANDIGARH DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-IPlot No. 5-B, Sector 19-B, Madhya marg, Chandigarh - 160019CONSUMER CASE NO. 635 of 2010 1. Mrs. Manorma RajW/o raj KUmar R/o House No. 287 Sector-23/A Chandigarh ...........Appellant(s)Vs.1. M/s Cat Walk the Fashion PeepleA ...
Case Number: 635
|
Date of Filing: 15-10-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
PROPRIETOR. ' NASCO FASHION JEWELLERY' V/S A.K.SUDHAN
Court Name: Kozhikode
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
CC NO. 325 Of 20101. A.K.SUDHANPRANAVASREE HOUSE, VENGALAM POKOZHIKODE 673303...........Complainant(s)Versus1. PROPRIETOR. " NASCO FASHION JEWELLERY"MOFUSIL BUSSTANT BUILDIG, MAVOOR ROADKOZHIKODE2. PROPRIETOR, NASCO FASHION JEWELLERY, NEAR BUS STAND(MARKET JN.), THIRUVNANTHAPURAM...
Case Number: 325
|
Date of Filing: 13-09-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Jean Point, Fashion Emporium V/S U.K.Patel
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
CHANDIGARH DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-IPlot No. 5-B, Sector 19-B, Madhya marg, Chandigarh - 160019CONSUMER CASE NO. 781 of 2010 1. U.K.PatelS/o Sh. K.L.patel #1188/A, Sector-28/B, Chandigarh ...........Appellant(s)Vs.1. Jean Point, Fashion EmporiumSCO NO. 57-58-59...
Case Number: 781
|
Date of Filing: 22-12-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
M/S. FASHION WONDER V/S UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO.LTD. & ORS
United India Insurance Fashion
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Mr. S. S. Vidyarthi
Respondant Advocate Mr. U. P. Warunjikar
BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIFirst Appeal No. A/09/1018(Arisen out of Order Dated 21/02/2009 in Case No. 280/2008 of District Thane)1. UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO.LTD. & ORSSHIV KRUPA BUILDING, 1ST FLOOR, NEAR TELEPHONE EXCHANG...
Case Number: 9
|
Date of Filing: 12-08-2009
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
PREMIER MAGIC COOK, C/O. PREMIER FASHION JWELLERS V/S R. VIJAYAKUMAR, NADUVILEDATH HOUSE
Court Name: Malappuram
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMCIVIL STATIONComplaint Case No. CC/10/57 1. R. VIJAYAKUMAR, NADUVILEDATH HOUSEODAKAYAM, VETTILAPARA-PO, 673639MALAPPURAMKERALA ...........Appellant(s)Versus.1. PREMIER MAGIC COOK, C/O. PREMIER FASHION JWELLERSRAILWAY STATION LINK ROAD, KA...
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 16-03-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
COLOUR PLUS FASHION WEAR V/S SAKKARIA FAIZAL P K
Court Name: Kozhikode
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
KOZHIKODECONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMCC NO. 194 Of 2010 1. SAKKARIA FAIZAL P KKIZHEKKE PUTHIYOTTIL PERINGALAM PO,KOZHIKODE ...........Appellant(s)Versus.1. COLOUR PLUS FASHION WEARS M STREET,KOZHIKODE-1 ...........Respondent(s) BEFORE:HONOURABLE MR. G Yadunadhan, BA.,LLB., ,...
Case Number: 194
|
Date of Filing: 15-05-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
M/s Sham Fashion Mall SCO No. 168-169 Sector-34/A Chandigarh through its Owner/Authorized Signatory V/S Ramandeep Singh
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
CHANDIGARH DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-IPlot No. 5-B, Sector 19-B, Madhya marg, Chandigarh - 160019CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 104 of 2010 1. Ramandeep SinghS/o Sh. Surinder pal Singh Booth No.110 Sector-38/C Chandigarh ...........Respondent(s) For the Appellant : For ...
Case Number: 104
|
Date of Filing: 16-07-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Fashion in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Fashion ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Fashion under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.