
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sanjeev Sharma, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,UNIONTERRITORY, CHANDIGARHRevision Petition No.31 of 2015Date of Institution17.08.2015Date of Decision20.08.2015Emaar MGF Land Limited, SCO No.120-122, Sector 17-C, Chandigarh through its Authorized Signatory. …..Revision Petiti...
Case Number: 31
|
Date of Filing: 17-08-2015
|
Date of Upload: 25-08-2015
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Capt. Arun Sharma & Ranbir Singh, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Sh.Sanjeev Sharma, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UNION TERRITORY, CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint No.100 of 2015Date of Institution21.05.2015Date of Decision19.08.2015Col.Kuldip Singh aged 76 years, s/o Col.Gursaran Singh, House No.147, Sector 35-A, Chandigarh. ….…Complai...
Case Number: 100
|
Date of Filing: 21-05-2015
|
Date of Upload: 28-08-2015
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Balwinder S Kalsi, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Sh.Sanjeev Sharma, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:95 of 2015Date of Institution:19.05.2015Date of Decision:18.08.2015Shri Shingara Singh son of Shri Bakshish Singh, 65, Cottes Brooke Gardens, East Munsbury, Northampton, U.K.2nd Address:-House No.36, ...
Case Number: 95
|
Date of Filing: 19-05-2015
|
Date of Upload: 27-08-2015
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Gaurav Bhardwaj,Adv.
Respondant Advocate Sh.Sanjeev Sharma, Adv.,
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARH Consumer Complaint:97 of 2015Date of Institution:19.05.2015Date of Decision:14.08.2015Manavjit Singh Sandhu S/o Gursohinder Pal Singh C/o Brig. J. S. Phoolka, House No.71, Sector -2, Chandigarh.Hari Simran Singh Sandhu...
Case Number: 97
|
Date of Filing: 19-05-2015
|
Date of Upload: 19-08-2015
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Deepak Aggarwal, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Sh.Ashim Aggarwal, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARH Consumer Complaint:76 of 2015Date of Institution:24.04.2015Date of Decision:03.08.2015Vinod Kumar Gupta son of Sh. M.R. Gupta presently residing at House No.1129, Sector 31-B, Chandigarh (U.T.), through General Power o...
Case Number: 76
|
Date of Filing: 24-04-2015
|
Date of Upload: 06-08-2015
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Ramandeep Singh Pandher
Respondant Advocate Sh.Sanjeev Sharma, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:80 of 2015Date of Institution:01.05.2015Date of Decision:29.07.2015Pankaj Garg son of Som Prakash Garg, resident of House No.578, Sector 7, Panchkula, Haryana, presently at 1094, Sobha Chrysanthemum, ...
Case Number: 80
|
Date of Filing: 01-05-2015
|
Date of Upload: 05-08-2015
Court Name: New Delhi
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-VI (DISTT. NEW DELHI), ‘M’ BLOCK, 1STFLOOR, VIKAS BHAWAN, I.P.ESTATE, NEW DELHI-110002.Case No.CC/286/12 Dated: In the matter of:Marketing & Tra...
Case Number: 286
|
Date of Filing: 28-03-2012
|
Date of Upload: 05-08-2015
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate A.S. Walia
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-I, U.T. CHANDIGARH========Consumer Complaint No.:CC/56/2015Date of Institution:30/01/2015Date of Decision:27/07/20151. Colonel S.K.Malhotra son of Maj.C.L. Malhotra, resident of D-57, Army Flats, MDC, Sector 4, Panchkula.2. Ms.Krishna Ma...
Case Number: 56
|
Date of Filing: 30-01-2015
|
Date of Upload: 30-07-2015
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Rajesh Verma, & Devinder Kumar Adv.
Respondant Advocate Sh.Sanjeev Sharma, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:81 of 2015Date of Institution:04.05.2015Date of Decision:16.07.2015Ms.Sunanda Banta wife of Sh. Vishwa Bhushan Banta, resident of Saraf Building, Ganj Bazaar, Shimla (H.P.).……Complainant...
Case Number: 81
|
Date of Filing: 04-05-2015
|
Date of Upload: 24-07-2015
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sandeep Bhardwaj, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARH Consumer Complaint:129 of 2015Date of Institution:25.06.2015Date of Decision:01.07.2015Deepak Jain, s/o Sh. S.K. Jain, H.No.1158, Universal Enclave, Sector 48-B,Chandigarh.Varun Sood, S/o Sh. R.K. Sood, H.No.341, Secto...
Case Number: 129
|
Date of Filing: 25-06-2015
|
Date of Upload: 06-07-2015
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Emaar in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Emaar ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Emaar under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.