company-name-logo

Education

Latest Judgments

Total 2464 Consumer Court Cases Against Education.

NCDRC

MAMTA RANI @ BABLI & 2 ORS. V/S POST GRADUATE INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL EDUCATION & RESEARCH (P.G.I.) & ANR.

Medical   Institute   Education  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. UDAY GUPTA & MR. RAJESH GARG

Respondant Advocate MR. MOHAN LAL TYAGI, NITESH SINGHI & PRIYA SINGHI

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 703 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 27/08/2013 in Complaint No. 16/2013 of the State Commission Chandigarh)1. POST GRADUATE INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL EDUCATION & RESEARCH (P.G.I.) & ANR.Through its Dirctor, Sect...

Case Number: 703

|

Date of Filing: 04-10-2013

|

Date of Upload: 24-01-2017

NCDRC

POST GRADUATE INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL EDUCATION & RESEARCH & ANR. V/S JASWINDER KUMAR, THROUGH LEGAL HEIRS

Medical   Institute   Education  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. MOHAN LAL SINGH, MR. NITESH SINGHI & MS. PRIYA SINGHI

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 737 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 27/08/2013 in Complaint No. 16/2013 of the State Commission Chandigarh)1. JASWINDER KUMAR, THROUGH LEGAL HEIRSS/O. SH. OM PARKASH VERMA R/O. AT. NO. 4, SARABHA NAGAR, SIR...

Case Number: 737

|

Date of Filing: 21-10-2013

|

Date of Upload: 24-01-2017

Rajasthan

Gagan Singh Rajawat S/O Late Shri Hem Singh Rajawat V/S Regional Collage For Education Reasearch & Technology through Chairman/Managing Director

Education  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Kailesh Sharma

Respondant Advocate

BEFORE THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,RAJASTHAN,JAIPUR BENCH NO.1FIRST APPEAL NO: 1088 /2016Regional College for Education Research & Technology, ISI 17, RIICO Industrial Area, Sitapura, Jaipur.Vs.Gagan Singh Rajawat r/o D 26 Prem Nagar, Jhotrawa, Jaipur & ors...

Case Number: 1088

|

Date of Filing: 31-08-2016

|

Date of Upload: 31-01-2017

NCDRC

CMD, PUNJAB AND SINDH BANK & ANR. V/S AMAR EDUCATION SOCIETY

Education   Society  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. S.L. GUPTA, MR. B.P. SINGH, MR. R.K. GUPTA & MR. KULDEEP SINGH TOMAR

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 34 OF 2017(Against the Order dated 30/11/2016 in Appeal No. 1279/2014 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. AMAR EDUCATION SOCIETYTHROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN BRIGADIER(RETD.) SH. M.L. BHANDARI 473 SEC. 37,...

Case Number: 34

|

Date of Filing: 03-01-2017

|

Date of Upload: 25-01-2017

Punjab

Chairman Shivalik College of Education V/S Amandeep Kaur

Education  

Court Name: Gurdaspur

Appelant Advocate Sh.Pardeep Singh, Adv.

Respondant Advocate Sh.Aseem Mahajan, Adv.

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, GURDASPURDISTRICT COURTS, JAIL ROAD, GURDASPURPHONE NO. 01874-245345Complaint Case No. CC/349/20161. Amandeep KaurD/o Hony Malkit singh R/o vill Ghot Pokar Teh and distt Gurdaspur...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Chairman Shivalik Colle...

Case Number: 349

|

Date of Filing: 20-09-2016

|

Date of Upload: 24-01-2017

Punjab

IDP Education India Limited V/S Gaganpreet Singh

Education  

Court Name: Sangrur

Appelant Advocate Shri Ritesh Jindal

Respondant Advocate

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, SANGRUR Complaint no. 639 Instituted on: 02.11.2016 Decided on: 02.01.2017Gaganpreet Singh Bedi son of Taranjeet Singh resident of Ward No.5, Khai Basti, Lehragaga, District Sangrur. ...

Case Number: 639

|

Date of Filing: 02-11-2016

|

Date of Upload: 16-01-2017

Haryana

Sudhir Gensets Limited V/S Shree Markandeshwar Education Trust Jalbehra Ismailabad

Education  

Court Name: Karnal

Appelant Advocate Sh. Y.S. Rathor

Respondant Advocate Sh. R.R. Sharma

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM KARNAL. Complaint No.461 of 2011 Date of instt.:03.08.2011 Date of decision:28.12.2016Shree Markandeshwar Education Trust Jalbehra,a Ismailbad, District Kurukshetra through its Chaiman G.S. Rana. ……..Complaina...

Case Number: 461

|

Date of Filing: 04-08-2011

|

Date of Upload: 06-01-2017

Uttarakhand

shiksha vibhag through district education officer V/S tajwar singh

Education  

Court Name: Chamoli

Appelant Advocate bharat singh rawat

Respondant Advocate Manoj Bhat

Heading1Heading2Execution Application No. EA/5/2016( Date of Filing : 15 Sep 2016 )InComplaint Case No. 14/20051. tajwar singhraag colony gopaswarchamoliuttranchal...........Appellant(s)Versus1. shiksha vibhag through district education officersiksha vibak basik siksha andikari c...

Case Number: 5

|

Date of Filing: 15-09-2016

|

Date of Upload: 08-08-2018

Kerala

The Managing Trustee, Your Charitable Education Trust, Rg. No. 36/2011, Building No. Vi/206, Kolagap V/S Mrs. Susan George, Aged 69 Years, Retired Professor, W/o Late T V George, Thengugal House ,

Education  

Court Name: Wayanad

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMCIVIL STATION ,KALPETTAWAYANAD-673122PHONE 04936-202755Complaint Case No. CC/111/20141. Mrs. Susan George, Aged 69 Years, Retired Professor, W/o Late T V George, Thengugal House , Residing at Sujo Engineering College P O, TrissurKerala2. Mr. Boby ...

Case Number: 111

|

Date of Filing: 30-05-2014

|

Date of Upload: 06-01-2017

Delhi

NARAYAN GROUP OF EDUCATION INSTITUTION V/S GURPARTAP SINGH

Education  

Court Name: West Delhi

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Present:- Counsel for complainant We have heard counsel for complainant on admission hearing at length and have gone through the material on record carefully and thoroughly. We are of the opinion that the main controversy/ issue is “whether Gurpartap singh, complainant, is ...

Case Number: 16

|

Date of Filing: 09-12-2016

|

Date of Upload: 20-12-2016

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Education in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Education ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Education under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.