
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate M.R. JAYAPRASAD
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONTHIRUVANANTHAPURAMComplaint Case No. CC/115/2017( Date of Filing : 28 Apr 2017 )1. KRISHNADAS.P.BNANDANAM, BY LANE NO.11, OLD DESAM FERRY ROAD, THOTTAKKATTUKARA, ALUVA-683108...........Complainant(s)Versus1. DLF SOUTHERN TOWERS PVT LTD ...
Case Number: 115
|
Date of Filing: 28-04-2017
|
Date of Upload: 28-12-2022
Court Name: Lucknow-I
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. CC/640/2013( Date of Filing : 27 Jul 2013 )1. RAMANAND CHAURASIA............Complainant(s)Versus1. DLF PREMERICA.............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. Neelkuntha Sahya PRESIDENTHON'BLE MS. sonia Singh MEMBER Ashok Kumar Singh MEMBER PRESE...
Case Number: 640
|
Date of Filing: 27-07-2013
|
Date of Upload: 22-09-2022
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate M.S. Raghavendra Prasad
Respondant Advocate Udaya Shankar
BEFORE THE KARNATAKA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, BANGALOREDATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF AUGUST 2022PRESENTSRI. RAVI SHANKAR : JUDICIAL MEMBERSMT. SUNITA C. BAGEWADI : MEMBERAppeal No. 1647/2012M/s. DLF Southern Homes Pvt. Ltd. Office at 1st Floor, Thapar Niketan,Br...
Case Number: 1647
|
Date of Filing: 22-08-2012
|
Date of Upload: 15-10-2022
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Rajinder Singh Rana & K.L. Saini Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHExecution Application No.:168 of 2019Date of Institution:15.05.2019Date of Decision:18.08.20221] Mrs. Saveena Goel wife of Rakesh Goel, resident of House No.148/11, Tarana Hill, Mandi-175001, Himachal Pradesh, India.2] ...
Case Number: 168
|
Date of Filing: 15-05-2019
|
Date of Upload: 23-08-2022
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Anoop Kumar & Farhat Jamal Siddiqui
Respondant Advocate T.J.S. MAKKAR
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010Complaint Case No. CC/198/2017( Date of Filing : 29 May 2017 )1. Satpal GargAmritsar...........Complainant(s)Versus1. M/S DLF Universal LtdGurgaon............Opp.Par...
Case Number: 198
|
Date of Filing: 29-05-2017
|
Date of Upload: 10-08-2022
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate In Person
Respondant Advocate
State Consumer Disputes Redressal CommissionU.T., Chandigarh(Review Application No.3 of 2021) Maj. Gen. (Retd.) M. P. SinghVsDLF Homes Panchkula Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.BEFORE:JUSTICE RAJ SHEKHAR ATTRI, PRESIDENTRAJESH K. ARYA, MEMBERARGUED BY:Maj. Gen. (Retd.) M.P. Singh, applicant/...
Case Number: 3
|
Date of Filing: 03-09-2021
|
Date of Upload: 08-08-2022
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate In Person
Respondant Advocate
State Consumer Disputes Redressal CommissionU.T., ChandigarhMA/307/2022 in CC/95/2018Hakam SinghVsDLF Homes Panchkula Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.BEFORE:JUSTICE RAJ SHEKHAR ATTRI, PRESIDENTPADMA PANDEY, MEMBERRAJESH K. ARYA, MEMBERARGUED BY:-Sh. Hakam Singh, applicant/complainant in pers...
Case Number: 307
|
Date of Filing: 26-04-2022
|
Date of Upload: 08-08-2022
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate In Person
Respondant Advocate
State Consumer Disputes Redressal CommissionU.T., ChandigarhEA/88/2020 Col. Naresh Kumar KohliVsDLF Homes Panchkula Pvt. Ltd.BEFORE:JUSTICE RAJ SHEKHAR ATTRI, PRESIDENTPADMA PANDEY, MEMBERRAJESH K. ARYA, MEMBERARGUED BY:Col. Naresh Kumar Kohli, Decree Holder No.1 (Advocate) in pe...
Case Number: 848
|
Date of Filing: 01-12-2020
|
Date of Upload: 27-07-2022
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate In Person
Respondant Advocate
State Consumer Disputes Redressal CommissionU.T., ChandigarhEA/88/2020 Col. Naresh Kumar KohliVsDLF Homes Panchkula Pvt. Ltd.BEFORE:JUSTICE RAJ SHEKHAR ATTRI, PRESIDENTPADMA PANDEY, MEMBERRAJESH K. ARYA, MEMBERARGUED BY:Col. Naresh Kumar Kohli, Decree Holder No.1 (Advocate) in pe...
Case Number: 88
|
Date of Filing: 14-07-2020
|
Date of Upload: 27-07-2022
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. KARANJAWALA & CO.
Respondant Advocate MR. THAKUR SUMIT
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 783 OF 2019(Against the Order dated 14/03/2019 in Complaint No. 805/2017 of the State Commission Chandigarh) 1. DLF HOMES PANCHKULA PVT. LTD.THROUGH ITS AUTHORISED REP. SCO NO 190-191-192, SECTOR 8CCHANDIGA...
Case Number: 783
|
Date of Filing: 29-04-2019
|
Date of Upload: 25-07-2022
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Dlf in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Dlf ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Dlf under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.