
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Vaibhav Narang, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
Counsel for the complainants states that by filing this complaint, the complainants had sought refund of amount paid with interest etc. He states that now on account of changed circumstances, the complainants wish to claim possession of the unit, in question. In view of above, Co...
Case Number: 307
|
Date of Filing: 07-04-2017
|
Date of Upload: 13-04-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
This application has been filed by the applicants/Opposite Parties for depositing an amount of Rs.9,53,593/- by way of demand draft bearing No.515075 dated 21.03.2018, with this Commission, in terms of order dated 19.01.2018 passed by Hon'ble National Consumer Disputes Redres...
Case Number: 179
|
Date of Filing: 22-03-2018
|
Date of Upload: 24-04-2019
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Jagjeet Beniwal,Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:521 of 2017Date of Institution:07.07.2017Date of Decision:22.03.2018Yashbir Singh son of Shri Rajpal Singh resident of House No.1150, Sector 9, Karnal, District Karnal.…….Complainant.Ver...
Case Number: 521
|
Date of Filing: 05-07-2017
|
Date of Upload: 22-03-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Harish Nain Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:576 of 2017Date of Institution:26.07.2017Date of Decision:22.03.2018Col. Satya Vrat Sheoran son of Late Major Bharat Singh Sheoran resident of 424 Defence Colony, Hisar.…….Complainant.Ve...
Case Number: 576
|
Date of Filing: 26-07-2017
|
Date of Upload: 22-03-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Bhupander Ghanghas, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
It is stated by Counsel for the decree holder that in terms of order passed by the Hon'ble National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi in appeal bearing No.2539 of 2017, let he be allowed to withdraw this execution application, at this stage, with liberty to fi...
Case Number: 77
|
Date of Filing: 01-03-2018
|
Date of Upload: 03-04-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Himanshu Puri, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:418 of 2017Date of Institution:15.05.2017Date of Decision:16.03.2018Mamta Yadav W/o Sunil Yadav R/o H.No.720-P, Sector-47, Gurgaon.…….Complainant.VersusDLF Homes Panchkula Pvt. Ltd., SCO...
Case Number: 418
|
Date of Filing: 15-05-2017
|
Date of Upload: 19-03-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Vipul Dharmani Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:438 of 2017Date of Institution:23.05.2017Date of Decision:16.03.2018Krishna Puri, Aged 65 years, wife of Shri Rajesh Puri, resident of House No.354, Sector 11, Panchkula (Haryana).…….Com...
Case Number: 438
|
Date of Filing: 23-05-2017
|
Date of Upload: 19-03-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:614 of 2017Date of Institution:18.08.2017Date of Decision:16.03.20181. Brig. Ashwani Kumar Goyal son of Sh. Som Nath,2. Meenu Goyal, wife of Brig. Ashwani Kumar Coyal,Both are permanent resident of C/...
Case Number: 614
|
Date of Filing: 18-08-2017
|
Date of Upload: 19-03-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate R.P. Dangi Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:665 of 2017Date of Institution:06.09.2017Date of Decision:16.03.20181. Dr. Sunil Kumar Sharma son of Sh. Subhash Sharma Resident of H.No.5, Doctor Residence, Mahavir Dal Hospital, Kunjpura Road, Karna...
Case Number: 665
|
Date of Filing: 06-09-2017
|
Date of Upload: 19-03-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav & Vineet Yadav, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:713 of 2017Date of Institution:29.09.2017Date of Decision:16.03.2018Ashok Anand S/o Late Sh. Kala Ram R/o 226 FF, Sector – 16, Panchkula.…….Complainant.Versus1. DLF Homes Panchkula...
Case Number: 713
|
Date of Filing: 29-09-2017
|
Date of Upload: 19-03-2018
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Dlf Homes in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Dlf Homes ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Dlf Homes under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.