Dlf Homes
Latest Judgments
Total 1231 Consumer Court Cases Against Dlf Homes.
DLF Homes Panchkula Pvt. Ltd. V/S Brig Subhash Chander Panwar, SM
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Parveen Gupta Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHExecution Application No.:5 of 2020Date of Institution:09.01.2021Date of Decision:14.01.2021Brig. Subhash Chander Panwar, SM S/o Sh. Ram Chander Panwar, Deputy General Officer Commanding, P-284, Station House, Bharuwala...
Case Number: 5
|
Date of Filing: 09-01-2020
|
Date of Upload: 14-01-2021
DLF Homes Panchkula Pvt. Ltd. V/S Shiv Lal Chabra
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav & Vineet Yadav Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint case No.:21 of 2020Date of Institution:15.01.2020Date of Decision:11.01.2021Shiv Lal Chabra S/o Sh.Aasa Nand R/o H.No.80, Ram Nagar, Karnal, Haryana.…… ComplainantV e r s u sDLF Homes Panchkula P...
Case Number: 21
|
Date of Filing: 15-01-2020
|
Date of Upload: 19-01-2021
M/S DLF HOMES PANCHKULA V/S SATISH NARANG
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate VIVEK MOHAN
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, HARYANA PANCHKULA Complaint Case No.665 of 2018Date of the Institution: 12.12.2018Date of Decision: 07.01.2021Satish Chander Narang, R/o House No.2376, Street Number-23, Gaushala Road, Abohar, District Fazilka-152116 through its autho...
Case Number: 665
|
Date of Filing: 13-12-2018
|
Date of Upload: 27-01-2021
DLF Homes Panchkula Pvt. Ltd V/S Smt. Surinder Pal Kaur
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Puneet Tuli Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint:163 of 2019Date of Institution:22.07.2019Date of Decision:16.12.2020Smt. Surinder Pal Kaur W/o Sh. Amarjit Singh Sawhney R/o BG-1/195, Paschim Vihar, New Delhi.Sh. Amarjit Singh Sawhney S/o Late Sh. H...
Case Number: 163
|
Date of Filing: 22-07-2019
|
Date of Upload: 23-12-2020
DLF Homes Panchkula Pvt. Ltd. V/S Amit Kumar Gupta
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Mukand Gupta & Geeta Gupta Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHExecution Application No.:14 of 2020Date of Institution:17.01.2020Date of Decision:07.12.2020.Amit Kumar Gupta, aged 46 years, son of Amrit Lal Gupta, 3056, Gupta Nursing Home, 2-A, Power House Road, Bathinda, District ...
Case Number: 14
|
Date of Filing: 17-01-2020
|
Date of Upload: 12-12-2020
DLF Homes Panchkula Pvt.Ltd. V/S Surender Singh Rathee
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav & Vineet Yadav Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHM.A No.:68 of 2020 inEA 301 of 2019Date of Institution:15.01.2020Date of Decision:16.10.2020Surender Singh Rathee s/o Sh.Dharamvir Singh R/o Flat No.40-C, Army Flats, Sector 4, Mansa Devi Complex, Panchkula.…..Ap...
Case Number: 68
|
Date of Filing: 15-01-2020
|
Date of Upload: 04-11-2020
DLF Homes Panchkula Private Limited V/S Sandeep Kalia
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Abhineet Taneja Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHMiscellaneous Application No.:1117 of 2019 in EA No.384 of 2017Date of Institution:17.12.2019Date of Decision:13.08.2020Sandeep Kalia S/o Late Sh. Ram Sarup KaliaArti Kalia W/o Sh. Lalit Mohan KaliaBoth residents of Hou...
Case Number: 1117
|
Date of Filing: 17-12-2019
|
Date of Upload: 19-08-2020
DLF Homes Panchkula Pvt. Ltd. V/S Col. Sanjay Garg
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Narender Yadav & Vineet Yadav Adv.
Respondant Advocate
Sh. Shiv Kumar, Advisor (Legal) of the judgment debtors has filed calculation sheet, as per which, only an amount of Rs.98,200/- remains to be paid by the judgment debtors to the decree holders to satisfy the decree passed by this Commission. He has further submitted that the sa...
Case Number: 421
|
Date of Filing: 05-11-2019
|
Date of Upload: 08-05-2020
DLF Homes Panchkula V/S Sombir Singh
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Ashish Pannu Adv.
Respondant Advocate
This execution application has been filed by the decree holder/complainant under Section 27 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 for execution of the order dated 27.02.2017 passed by this Commission in Consumer Complaint bearing No.632 of 2016. It be registered. Notice be issued ...
Case Number: 31
|
Date of Filing: 18-02-2020
|
Date of Upload: 09-03-2020
DLF HOMES PANCHKULA PRIVATE LIMITED & 2 ORS. V/S SUKHDEV SINGH DHILLON & ANR.
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. HIMANSHU DHAWAN & MR. VINEET BHAGAT
Respondant Advocate M/S. KARANJAWALA & CO
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1676 OF 2019(Against the Order dated 27/03/2019 in Appeal No. 217/2017 of the State Commission Haryana)1. SUKHDEV SINGH DHILLON & ANR.S/O. RANJIT SINGH, R/O. HOUSE NO. 3460, SAI ENCLAVE, SECTOR 49-D,CH...
Case Number: 1676
|
Date of Filing: 24-07-2019
|
Date of Upload: 18-02-2020
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Dlf Homes in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Dlf Homes ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Dlf Homes under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.