Development Authority
Latest Judgments
Total 3634 Consumer Court Cases Against Development Authority.
ESTATE OFFICER, SPECIAL AREA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S SMT. RICHA PACHAURI D/O SHRI PURUSOTTAM PACHAURI
Court Name: Gwalior
Appelant Advocate DILIP THAKUR
Respondant Advocate vishal tripathi
Case Number: 82
|
Date of Filing: 03-02-2024
|
Date of Upload: 29-11-2024
ESTATE OFFICER, SPECIAL AREA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S MANISH SHARMA S/O SHRI SURESH KUMAR SHARMA
Court Name: Gwalior
Appelant Advocate DILIP THAKUR
Respondant Advocate vishal tripathi
Case Number: 80
|
Date of Filing: 03-02-2024
|
Date of Upload: 29-11-2024
Naimuddin V/S Agra Development Authority
Agra Development Authority Development Authority
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate R K Gupta
Respondant Advocate T.H.Naqvi
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/2010/754( Date of Filing : 03 May 2010 )(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. of District State Commission)1. Agra Development Authoritya...........
Case Number: 2010
|
Date of Filing: 03-05-2010
|
Date of Upload: 02-12-2024
Greater Mohali Area Development Authority and another V/S Harjit Kaur Gill
Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Development Authority
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Ranjinder Singh Sidhu
Respondant Advocate J.P.S. GILL
Case Number: 55
|
Date of Filing: 29-08-2022
|
Date of Upload: 05-12-2024
ESTATE OFFICER, SPECIAL AREA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S DEEPAK SHARMA S/O SHRI SURESH KUMAR SHARMA
Court Name: Gwalior
Appelant Advocate DILIP THAKUR
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 81
|
Date of Filing: 03-02-2024
|
Date of Upload: 27-11-2024
RADHA THAKUR W/O VINOD KUMAR THAKUR V/S HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY NOW, HARYANA SHEHRI VIKAS PRADHIKARAN& OTHERS
Haryana Urban Development Authority Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR LOKESH SINHAL
Respondant Advocate MR. NAVEEN SHARMA
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1559 OF 2023(Against the Order dated 24/02/2023 in Appeal No. 42/2022 of the State Commission Haryana) 1. HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY NOW, HARYANA SHEHRI VIKAS PRADHIKARAN& OTHERSTHROUGH THE AD...
Case Number: 1559
|
Date of Filing: 09-06-2023
|
Date of Upload: 26-11-2024
RAJ KUMAR WADHWA S/O CHUNNI LAL V/S HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY NOW, HARYANA SHEHRI VIKAS PRADHIKARAN& OTHERS
Haryana Urban Development Authority Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. LOKESH SINHAL & NIKUNJ GUPTA
Respondant Advocate MR. NAVEEN SHARMA
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1559 OF 2023(Against the Order dated 24/02/2023 in Appeal No. 42/2022 of the State Commission Haryana) 1. HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY NOW, HARYANA SHEHRI VIKAS PRADHIKARAN& OTHERSTHROUGH THE AD...
Case Number: 1560
|
Date of Filing: 09-06-2023
|
Date of Upload: 26-11-2024
Punjab Urban Planning & Development Authority V/S Balvinder Kaur
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Munish Goel
Respondant Advocate ASHISH GROVER
Case Number: 39
|
Date of Filing: 08-06-2022
|
Date of Upload: 05-12-2024
Greater Mohali Area Development Authority (GMADA) V/S Gamdur Singh Brar
Greater Mohali Area Development Authority Development Authority
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate G.S. SMAG SPA
Respondant Advocate G.S. ARSHI
Case Number: 1
|
Date of Filing: 01-01-2019
|
Date of Upload: 29-11-2024
Wahid Husain V/S Agra Development Authority
Agra Development Authority Development Authority
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Arvind Kumar
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/2008/833( Date of Filing : 29 Apr 2008 )(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. of District )1. Agra Development Authority a...........Appellant(s)...
Case Number: 2008
|
Date of Filing: 29-04-2008
|
Date of Upload: 22-11-2024
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Development Authority in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Development Authority ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Development Authority under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.