
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. ARTI BANSAL & ASSOCIATES
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4676 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 12/11/2013 in Appeal No. 377/2013 of the State Commission Delhi) WITH IA/7739/20131. DELHI JAL BOARDEXECUTIVE ENGINEER, KARAM PURA NEW DELHI - 110008...........Pet...
Case Number: 4676
|
Date of Filing: 09-12-2013
|
Date of Upload: 20-01-2014
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. ARVIND KUMAR VERMA
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3020 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 29/05/2012 in Appeal No. 84/2011 of the State Commission Delhi)1. DELHI JAL BOARDThrough Executive Engineer NajafgarhNew DelhiDelhi...........Petitioner(s)Versus1. ...
Case Number: 3020
|
Date of Filing: 16-08-2012
|
Date of Upload: 11-12-2013
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MS. ARTI BANSAL
Respondant Advocate M/S. DHIR & DHIR ASSOCIATES
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2915 OF 2008(Against the Order dated 03/03/2008 in Appeal No. 371/2007 of the State Commission Delhi)1. DELHI JAL BOARDThrough its Zonal Revenue Officer, South West III, Sector - 7,New Delhi - 110 022D...
Case Number: 2915
|
Date of Filing: 17-07-2008
|
Date of Upload: 08-08-2013
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. NARESH SHARMA
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 706 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 11/01/2012 in Appeal No. 739/2011 of the State Commission Delhi)1. DELHI JAL BOARDThrough Chief Executive Officer, Varunalaya Phase-II JhandewalanNew Delhi Delhi.......
Case Number: 706
|
Date of Filing: 16-02-2012
|
Date of Upload: 02-11-2012
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. NARESH SHARMA
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 518 OF 2012 IN RP/706/20121. DELHI JAL BOARD...........Appellants(s)Versus1. PROJECT MANAGER OF OBEROI APARTMENT...........Respondent(s) BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHAN, PRESIDENTHO...
Case Number: 518
|
Date of Filing: 03-08-2012
|
Date of Upload: 17-08-2012
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. NARESH SHARMA
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 706 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 11/01/2012 in Appeal No. 739/2011 of the State Commission Delhi)1. DELHI JAL BOARDThrough Chief Executive Officer, Varunalaya Phase-II JhandewalanNew Delhi Delhi.......
Case Number: 706
|
Date of Filing: 16-02-2012
|
Date of Upload: 06-07-2012
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. H.S. KOHIL
Respondant Advocate -
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2945 OF 2007(Against the Order dated 17/04/2007 in Appeal No. 445/2004 of the State Commission Delhi)1. DELHI JAL BOARD & ANR.VARUNALAYA BUILDING, JHANDEWALAN, NEW DELHI - 110055...........Petitioner(s...
Case Number: 2945
|
Date of Filing: 29-08-2007
|
Date of Upload: 17-11-2011
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate H.S.KOHLI
Respondant Advocate -
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3986 OF 2006(Against the Order dated 07/07/2006 in Appeal No. 2334/2001 of the State Commission Delhi)1. DELHI JAL BOARDAARUNALAYA BUILDING PHASE , -II JHANDEWALAN NEW DELHI -110055...........Petitio...
Case Number: 3986
|
Date of Filing: 19-12-2006
|
Date of Upload: 01-03-2011
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate H.S.KOHLI
Respondant Advocate -
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3987 OF 2006(Against the Order dated 07/07/2006 in Appeal No. 344/2001 of the State Commission Delhi)1. DELHI JAL BOARDAARUNALAYA BUILDING PHASE , -II JHANDEWALAN NEW DELHI -110055...........Petition...
Case Number: 3987
|
Date of Filing: 19-12-2006
|
Date of Upload: 01-03-2011
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. H.S. KOHLI
Respondant Advocate IN PERSON
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 621 OF 2006(Against the Order dated 18/10/2005 in Appeal No. 507/2003 of the State Commission Delhi)1. DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYVIKAS SADAN I.N.A. NEW DELHI NEW DELHI ...........Petitioner(s)Versus1...
Case Number: 1393
|
Date of Filing: 02-06-2006
|
Date of Upload: 20-01-2011
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Delhi Jal Board in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Delhi Jal Board ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Delhi Jal Board under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.