
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate Arun Kumar
Respondant Advocate
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum-I, U.T., Chandigarh Execution Application NO. 107 OF 2018in CC/23/2018Renu Thakur Vs The Institute of Computer Accounts of India and another BEFORE: RATTAN SINGH THAKUR, PRESIDENT SURJEET KAUR, MEMBER SURESH KUMAR SARDANA, MEMBERPRESENT:...
Case Number: 107
|
Date of Filing: 31-07-2018
|
Date of Upload: 04-10-2018
Court Name: Kolkata-I(North)
Appelant Advocate Rakesh Gupta and 3 others
Respondant Advocate
Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Kolkata - I (North)8B, Nelie Sengupta Sarani, 4th Floor, Kolkata-700087.Web-site - confonet.nic.inComplaint Case No. CC/108/2018( Date of Filing : 29 Mar 2018 )1. Sri Imran KhanS/o Akhtar Khan, 16 C, Beck Bagan Row, P.S. - Karaya, Kolkata - 7000...
Case Number: 108
|
Date of Filing: 29-03-2018
|
Date of Upload: 28-09-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Mr. N. R. Mukherjee
Respondant Advocate In-Person.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONWEST BENGAL11A, Mirza Ghalib Street, Kolkata - 700087First Appeal No. A/17/2017( Date of Filing : 06 Jan 2017 )(Arisen out of Order Dated 06/12/2016 in Case No. Complaint Case No. CC/169/2016 of District Kolkata-II(Central))1. Computer ...
Case Number: 17
|
Date of Filing: 06-01-2017
|
Date of Upload: 10-09-2018
Court Name: Baudh
Appelant Advocate R.Patra & Others
Respondant Advocate L.D.Adv
Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. CC/33/2016( Date of Filing : 01 Jul 2016 )1. Harihara KarnaAt:Dantapali Po:Ainapali Dist:BoudhBoudh...........Complainant(s)Versus1. In Charge Computer Cell Tahasildar,BoudhOffice of the Tahasildar ,Boudh At/Po/Ps:BoudhBoudh2. Tahasildar,BoudhAt...
Case Number: 33
|
Date of Filing: 01-07-2016
|
Date of Upload: 04-09-2018
Court Name: Chhindwara
Appelant Advocate MR. K.L.PAWAR
Respondant Advocate KOI NAHI
Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. CC/169/2016( Date of Filing : 16 Aug 2016 )1. MR. ANITA GIRARECHHINDWARA CHHINDWARAMADHYA PRADESH...........Complainant(s)Versus1. PRATIGYA EDUCATION COMPUTER CENTERHDFC BANK KE PAAS CHHINDWARA MP.CHHINDWARAMADHYA PRADESH............Opp.Party(s)...
Case Number: 169
|
Date of Filing: 16-08-2016
|
Date of Upload: 30-05-2019
Court Name: Koraput
Appelant Advocate Self
Respondant Advocate Sri K.Dibakar Rao
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTE REDRESSAL FORUM KORAPUT AT JEYPORE,ODISHAComplaint Case No. CC/16/79( Date of Filing : 15 Jul 2016 )1. Sri Hemaraj PanigrahiAt-Power House Colony, Jeypore KoraputOdisha...........Complainant(s)Versus1. The Proprietor, M/s. Computer SolutionNear Gurudwar,...
Case Number: 16
|
Date of Filing: 15-07-2016
|
Date of Upload: 17-11-2018
Court Name: Bargarh
Appelant Advocate M.B. Tripathy with other Advocates
Respondant Advocate
Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. CC/48/2017( Date of Filing : 16 Oct 2017 )1. Hudananda SaR/o. Tora,Ps/Dist. BargarhBargarhOdisha...........Complainant(s)Versus1. (1) Poonam Computerrepresented through its proprietor, Main Road, Near Dharmasala Chowk, At/Po/Ps/Dist. BargarhBarg...
Case Number: 48
|
Date of Filing: 16-10-2017
|
Date of Upload: 31-08-2018
Court Name: SAS Nagar Mohali
Appelant Advocate H.P.S Kochhar
Respondant Advocate
Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. CC/643/2015( Date of Filing : 02 Dec 2015 )1. Vishal MehtaS/o Kuldeep Mehta, R/o H.No.1008, Sector 56, Chandigarh, Previously R/o H.No.HE161, Phase-1, Mohali............Complainant(s)Versus1. Institute of Computer Accountants of India(Regd.) H.N...
Case Number: 643
|
Date of Filing: 02-12-2015
|
Date of Upload: 03-10-2018
Court Name: Yamunanagar
Appelant Advocate Parmod Bansal
Respondant Advocate
EA No.10 of 2018. Leena Mittal vs. M/s Bharat Computers.Present : Sh.Parmod Bansal, Adv.for DH. The ld. counsel for the DH made a statement that he does not want to proceed further with the present execution and withdraws the same. In view of the statement made by the l...
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 18-01-2018
|
Date of Upload: 12-07-2018
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Ms. Pritha Basu, Ms. Deblina Lahiri
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONWEST BENGAL11A, Mirza Ghalib Street, Kolkata - 700087First Appeal No. A/1072/2017( Date of Filing : 09 Oct 2017 )(Arisen out of Order Dated 10/07/2017 in Case No. CC/615/2016 of District Kolkata-III(South))1. Sushovan ChaudhuryS/o Swapa...
Case Number: 1072
|
Date of Filing: 09-10-2017
|
Date of Upload: 29-06-2018
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Computer in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Computer ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Computer under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.