
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate Sh. Anirudh Gupta Adv.
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-II,U.T. CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint No:111 of 2017Date of Institution:01.02.2017Date of Decision10.04.2017Shubham Sood s/o Smt.Anita Sood r/o H.No. Set No.3, Durga Village, Upper Kaithu, Shimla-171003. …..ComplainantVersusThe Man...
Case Number: 111
|
Date of Filing: 02-02-2017
|
Date of Upload: 27-04-2017
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. KHAITAN & CO.
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3156 OF 2016(Against the Order dated 25/07/2016 in Appeal No. 948/2015 of the State Commission Punjab)1. BENETTON INDIA PRIVATE LIMITEDOFFICE AT PLOT NO. 25, BLOCK B, INFOCITY SECTOR 34,GURUGRAM-122001...
Case Number: 3156
|
Date of Filing: 07-11-2016
|
Date of Upload: 10-02-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sumeet Goel, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONUT CHANDIGARHFirst Appeal No. A/19/2017(Arisen out of Order Dated 30/11/2016 in Case No. Complaint Case No. CC/586/2016 of District DF-II)1. Benetton India Private LimitedChandigarh...........Appellant(s)Versus1. Raghav GoelChandigarh.....
Case Number: 19
|
Date of Filing: 27-01-2017
|
Date of Upload: 06-02-2017
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate Atul Goyal Adv. & Arjun Kundra Adv.
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-II, U.T. CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint No.:842 of 2016Date of Institution:04.10.2016Date of Decision:27.01.2017Lalit Kumar Goel s/o Sh.Satish Kumar Goel r/o H.No.1676, Sector 33, Chandigarh. …..ComplainantVersusUnited Color of Bene...
Case Number: 842
|
Date of Filing: 04-10-2016
|
Date of Upload: 07-02-2017
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate In Person
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-II, U.T. CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint No.:734 of 2016Date of Institution:07.09.2016Date of Decision:03.01.2017P.P.Singh s/o Late Sh.Satwant Singh r/o H.o.106, Sector 11-A, Chandigarh. …..ComplainantVersusUnited Color of Benetton, ...
Case Number: 734
|
Date of Filing: 07-09-2016
|
Date of Upload: 19-01-2017
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate In person
Respondant Advocate
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum-I, U.T., Chandigarh Execution Application NO. 140 OF 2016in CC/467/2015Ravinderjit Singh Vs United Colors of Benetton BEFORE: SURJEET KAUR, PRESIDING MEMBER SURESH KUMAR SARDANA, MEMBERPRESENT: Complainant in person.Sh.Krishan M.Vohra, P...
Case Number: 140
|
Date of Filing: 08-09-2016
|
Date of Upload: 23-12-2016
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate Saurav Bhatia Adv.
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-II, U.T. CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint No:733 of 2016Date of Institution:07.09.2016Date of Decision:12.12.2016Anjali Moudgil d/o Ashwani Kumar r/o Anukampa, Main Street, Mohan Nagar, Dera Bassi. …..ComplainantVersusUnited Color of ...
Case Number: 733
|
Date of Filing: 07-09-2016
|
Date of Upload: 20-12-2016
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate Jasjit Singh Saini Adv.
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-II, U.T. CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint No:623 of 2016Date of Institution:22.08.2016Date of Decision:07.10.2016Mohit Goyal s/o Sh.Rajan Goyal r/o H.No.202, Sector 9, Panchkula. …..ComplainantVersusUnited Colour of Benetton, ADI Spor...
Case Number: 623
|
Date of Filing: 22-08-2016
|
Date of Upload: 28-11-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sorabh Sharma
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 948
|
Date of Filing: 21-08-2015
|
Date of Upload: 04-08-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sorabh Sharma Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,UNION TERRITORY, CHANDIGARHAppeal No.61 of 2016Date of Institution16.02.2016Date of Decision18.02.2016Benetton India Private Ltd. (Also known as : UNITED COLORS OF BENETTON) Agent : Adi Sports (Elante Mall), 178-178A, Industrial Area, ...
Case Number: 61
|
Date of Filing: 16-02-2016
|
Date of Upload: 10-03-2016
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Benetton in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Benetton ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Benetton under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.