
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Dhawal P S Ahluwalia, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Sh. Puneet Tuli, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint No.:382 of 2016Date of Institution:22.07.2016Date of Decision:05.12.2016Sh.Sarbjot Singh Sandhu andSohan Singh Sandhu wife of Sarbjot Singh SandhuBoth residents of #564-L, Model Town, Jalandhar, Punjab.&hellip...
Case Number: 383
|
Date of Filing: 22-07-2016
|
Date of Upload: 05-12-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sandeep Suri, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Sh. Puneet Tuli, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint No.:382 of 2016Date of Institution:22.07.2016Date of Decision:05.12.2016Sh.Sarbjot Singh Sandhu andSohan Singh Sandhu wife of Sarbjot Singh SandhuBoth residents of #564-L, Model Town, Jalandhar, Punjab.&hellip...
Case Number: 384
|
Date of Filing: 22-07-2016
|
Date of Upload: 08-12-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Dhawal P S Ahluwalia, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Sh. Puneet Tuli, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint No.:382 of 2016Date of Institution:22.07.2016Date of Decision:05.12.2016Sh.Sarbjot Singh Sandhu andSohan Singh Sandhu wife of Sarbjot Singh SandhuBoth residents of #564-L, Model Town, Jalandhar, Punjab.&hellip...
Case Number: 385
|
Date of Filing: 22-07-2016
|
Date of Upload: 08-12-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Dhawal P S Ahluwalia, Adv.,
Respondant Advocate Sh. Puneet Tuli, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint No.:382 of 2016Date of Institution:22.07.2016Date of Decision:05.12.2016Sh.Sarbjot Singh Sandhu andSohan Singh Sandhu wife of Sarbjot Singh SandhuBoth residents of #564-L, Model Town, Jalandhar, Punjab.&hellip...
Case Number: 386
|
Date of Filing: 22-07-2016
|
Date of Upload: 08-12-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sandeep Suri, adv.
Respondant Advocate Sh. Puneet Tuli, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint No.:382 of 2016Date of Institution:22.07.2016Date of Decision:05.12.2016Sh.Sarbjot Singh Sandhu andSohan Singh Sandhu wife of Sarbjot Singh SandhuBoth residents of #564-L, Model Town, Jalandhar, Punjab.&hellip...
Case Number: 387
|
Date of Filing: 22-07-2016
|
Date of Upload: 08-12-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sandeep Suri, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Sh. Puneet Tuli, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint No.:382 of 2016Date of Institution:22.07.2016Date of Decision:05.12.2016Sh.Sarbjot Singh Sandhu andSohan Singh Sandhu wife of Sarbjot Singh SandhuBoth residents of #564-L, Model Town, Jalandhar, Punjab.&hellip...
Case Number: 388
|
Date of Filing: 22-07-2016
|
Date of Upload: 08-12-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sandeep Suri, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Sh. Puneet Tuli, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint No.:382 of 2016Date of Institution:22.07.2016Date of Decision:05.12.2016Sh.Sarbjot Singh Sandhu andSohan Singh Sandhu wife of Sarbjot Singh SandhuBoth residents of #564-L, Model Town, Jalandhar, Punjab.&hellip...
Case Number: 389
|
Date of Filing: 22-07-2016
|
Date of Upload: 08-12-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate R.P.Sharma
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 123
|
Date of Filing: 21-04-2016
|
Date of Upload: 21-12-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Dhawal P.S. Ahluwalia, Adv
Respondant Advocate Sh. Puneet Tuli, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint No.:472 of 2016Date of Institution:18.08.2016Date of Decision:27.10.2016Gopal Krishan Pathak son of Oudh Narain Pathak, resident of Pathak House, Patiala State, Sangrur, presently residing at House no.1297, Se...
Case Number: 472
|
Date of Filing: 18-08-2016
|
Date of Upload: 30-11-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Dhawal P.S. Ahluwalia, Adv
Respondant Advocate Sh. Puneet Tuli, Adv.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHComplaint No.:472 of 2016Date of Institution:18.08.2016Date of Decision:27.10.2016Gopal Krishan Pathak son of Oudh Narain Pathak, resident of Pathak House, Patiala State, Sangrur, presently residing at House no.1297, Se...
Case Number: 473
|
Date of Filing: 18-08-2016
|
Date of Upload: 07-12-2016
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Bcl Homes in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Bcl Homes ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Bcl Homes under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.