company-name-logo

Bangalore Development Authority


Latest Judgments

Total 18 Consumer Court Cases Against Bangalore Development Authority.

Karnataka

The commissioner Bangalore Development Authority V/S Sri. Venkatapathy T.K.

Development Authority   Bangalore Development Authority  

Court Name: Bangalore 4th Additional

Appelant Advocate Sri Gurunath

Respondant Advocate

Complaint filed on: 18.06.2014 Disposed on: 03.04.2018BEFORE THE IV ADDL DISTRICTCONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, BENGALURU1ST FLOOR, BMTC, B-BLOCK, TTMC BUILDING, K.H.ROAD, SHANTHINAGAR, BENGALURU – 560 027 CC.No.1102/2014DATED THIS THE 03rd April OF 2018PRESENTSRI.S.L....

Case Number: 14

|

Date of Filing: 18-06-2014

|

Date of Upload: 07-04-2018

Karnataka

The commissioner Bangalore Development Authority V/S Sri. Venkatapathy T. k.

Development Authority   Bangalore Development Authority  

Court Name: Bangalore 4th Additional

Appelant Advocate Srinivasamandiram

Respondant Advocate

Complaint filed on: 18.06.2014 Disposed on: 03.04.2018BEFORE THE IV ADDL DISTRICTCONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, BENGALURU1ST FLOOR, BMTC, B-BLOCK, TTMC BUILDING, K.H.ROAD, SHANTHINAGAR, BENGALURU – 560 027 CC.No.1101/2014DATED THIS THE 03RD APRIL OF 2018PRESENTSRI.S.L....

Case Number: 14

|

Date of Filing: 19-06-2014

|

Date of Upload: 07-04-2018

Karnataka

The Commissioner, Bangalore Development Authority V/S Venkatesh B.T

Development Authority   Bangalore Development Authority  

Court Name: Bangalore 3rd Additional

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. CC/961/20141. Venkatesh B.TNo.1376, 1st Floor, Out House, 9th Main Road, Dr.Raj Road, Srinivasa Nagar, BSK 1st Stage, Bangalore-560 050. ...........Complainant(s)Versus1. The Commissioner, Bangalore Development Authority9th Main Road, Kumara Par...

Case Number: 961

|

Date of Filing: 03-06-2014

|

Date of Upload: 03-08-2016

Karnataka

Bangalore Development Authority V/S Ramesh J

Development Authority   Bangalore Development Authority  

Court Name: Bangalore Urban

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 14

|

Date of Filing: 18-03-2014

|

Date of Upload: 31-08-2015

Karnataka

The Deputy Secrtary Bangalore Development Authority V/S Sri M.K. Puttaswamy Aged About 60 Years

Development Authority   Bangalore Development Authority  

Court Name: Bangalore 4th Additional

Appelant Advocate Sri S. Nagesh

Respondant Advocate .

Case Number: 12

|

Date of Filing: 12-03-2012

|

Date of Upload: 25-03-2022

NCDRC

BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S QASI MIR SHAH ABUL HASAN & ORS.

Development Authority   Bangalore Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. GIRISH ANANTHAMURTHY

Respondant Advocate MR. S.K. KULKARNI

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 430 OF 2010(Against the Order dated 02/09/2010 in Complaint No. 226/2010 of the State Commission Karnataka)1. QASI MIR SHAH ABUL HASAN & ORS.R/O ,NO,4,RANOJI RAO ROAD BASVANAGUDI BANGALORE BANGALORE -560004...

Case Number: 430

|

Date of Filing: 15-12-2010

|

Date of Upload: 22-11-2011

NCDRC

S. NANJUNDA SWAMY V/S BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Development Authority   Bangalore Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. ANKUR S. KULKARNI

Respondant Advocate

Date of Filing: 15 Feb 2010 NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIREVISION PETITION NO. No. RP/754/2010(Against the Order dated 30/06/2009 in Appeal No. 1369/2009 of the State Commission Karnataka) 1. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYNo. 7, T Chowdayya Road, Kumar...

Case Number: 754

|

Date of Filing: 15-02-2010

|

Date of Upload: 01-04-2010

Karnataka

Bangalore Development Authority V/S Smt.R. Leelavathy

Development Authority   Bangalore Development Authority  

Court Name: Bangalore 2nd Additional

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 93

|

Date of Filing: 13-01-2006

|

Date of Upload: 29-08-2020

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Bangalore Development Authority in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Bangalore Development Authority ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Bangalore Development Authority under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.