+ Submit Your Complaint
Results 1 to 10 of 10

District Consumer courts Punjab

This is a discussion on District Consumer courts Punjab within the Suggestions and Feedback forums, part of the General Discussions category; I recently had a chance to read the Judgement of District Consumer Court Nawanshahr , Rajwinder singh v. Canara Bank ...

  1. #1
    Revolution is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    2

    Default District Consumer courts Punjab

    I recently had a chance to read the Judgement of District Consumer Court Nawanshahr , Rajwinder singh v. Canara Bank & Others.

    The employees of Bank are also named as Defendants by Plantiff. The Plaintiff himself is residing in England and filed complaint through his father. Facts of complaint are: The Plaintiff alleges that some one fraudently with drawns money from his bank account. Bank says that Plaintiff has withdrawn the money as they have his signature on withdrawn form. Bank did sign attestation from forensic labaratory and signatures were confirmed. At time of withdrawn of money, the plaintiff was in India and filed complaint with Consumer court through Father after 2 years of transcation when he left for England.

    Commission members are writing in Judgement that Defendants have failed to give proof that Plaintiff is in England. But in fact Plaintiff Rajwinder was not present during case filling, on any hearing and during evidence. How defendant can prove that plaintiff is in India or Else, when that person is not before Tribunal.

    Secondly on reading the Judgement, the Commission members are not explaining how Employees are liable to pay with Bank. Members should have taken in consideration that in Employer -Employee relationship, the work done by employee in good faith and in general course of duties, except fraudulent transcations, the employees are not liable in person. Their Employer is liable to any loss for work done in general course of employment duties by Employee.

    In summary or conclusion paragraph, the Commission members are saying defendants are liable to pay money to plaintiff.

    In judgement, No share of employee is calculated and why they are liable. No clear indication for defendant.
    I am surprised how justice is done in India without investigating facts provided and ignoring natural Justice.

  2. #2
    Unregistered Guest

    Post regarding fraud company stock guru india

    Respected sir/madam,

    I have deposit Rs 50,000 in this company stockguruindia, in 25 aug 2010 . they told me to give 20% interest per month in last they will give fully principal at last in 6 month but they only give my half payment and rest is still left to pay by company and now they closed there company my amount is in that company please help me my no is 9316179085.

  3. #3
    Unregistered Guest

    Default co-op housing society not given reply past two year for membership application

    my room was name of my grand mom she was nominated my father and mother after her death my father apply for membership but society till not given any reply

    i have all ready submitted form 18 indimennitty bond and form 15 membership application her death certificate,and nomination form copy in the nomination form my father and mother name mentioned which is duly certified by Notry

    pl give suggestion how take action against sceretory

  4. #4
    Unregistered Guest

    Angry Complaint agianst Connect telecom service

    i have to lodge a complaint against connect telecom punjab as i have lodge a request for a new connection as on 19th oct 2011 and paid the full amount against the reciept no 2172450 and i was advised that my connection will be in effect from 20th oct 2011 but as on 29th oct there is no progress going on my request whenever i call the head of luhiana zone he simply give excuses and even though connect head office is not able to solve my problem .....
    for any further enquiry please contact me on +91-9501178999 Simranjeeet Singh

  5. #5
    soumya12 is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    1

    Default In WESTBENGAL, KOLKATA AIRTEL CHIT WITH ME

    SIR AGAIN RS.85 WAS DEDUCTED FROM MY MAIN BALANCE.ONE MESSAGE COME TOME FROM AD-54321 i.e. THANKS FOR DOWNLOADING HUNGAMA RELATED GAMES ANDCHARGED RS. 85,which is absolutely wrong.so please arrange as I ableto get back my unauthorised deducted amounts.i.e. 30+85=115 and rs.149 total 115+149=rs.264 immediately.My airtel no. 9163889158alternative no. 9153728781

  6. #6
    rameshuniyal is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    1

    Default

    Reg: Quality related problem in Gear Box, VIN- MALA251ALBM018764
    Dear Sir,
    I am the owner of above mention VIN- MALA251ALBM018764 and registration no- of vehicle is PB-65Q-1073, Model: EON ERA, Purchased date: 09/11/2011. Till date the vehicle run only around 4000 KM and the first free service done by your authorized service center M/s Bhakra motors at Ropar.
    Now during my journey I noticed that there are problem in the gear box and the 3rd and 4th gear is slipping on little jump or speed breaker.
    This problem I have faced during the drive at hill road when I was with my family, the little jump on road did slip the 3rd gear and vehicle comes to neutral. It was our luck that there was no other vehicle behind me. I suddenly put the break and decided to cancel my further journey.
    I have visited your authorized service center at Bhakra Motors, Ropar, vehicle is checked by them and they confirmed me that this is the problem due to problem in syncro ring(as told me) of gear 3rd and 4th gear. They told me that it will be repair by open all the gear box.
    Then I have also visited at the Dealer from where I bought the vehicle at Joshi Hyundai, Mohali, But they have no time to check the problem. They are taking care of pre-delivery only, and nothing for post delivery issues.

    regards,
    Ramesh Uniyal
    Vehicle owner

  7. #7
    Unregistered Guest

    Default I complaint to ropar district consumer court

    Im navdeep chandla s/0o gopal singh chandla vill agampu teh anandpur sahib distt ropar (pb)
    i complaint that hyundai bhakra ropar cheated on me they take more money from me and they changes on bills on their on behalfs after i gave more money they donot not gave me the sale letter of my new car i20 (pb12j(t)6004) i want to take a number of my choice and they are gave me that number . Hyunday bhakhra ropar r theifs. I want to take my money that they take more from me and i want to take my sale letter of my car plz help me.

  8. #8
    Unregistered Guest

    Default Complaint about mobile tower in residential areas

    I want to register a complaint against a mobile tower installation in the residential complex on h no 312 moti bagh colony nabha dist patiala

    The mobile tower is installed at a low height and as per supreme court ruling, such towers are illegal and should be removed.

    Further to this, a large power generator is attached with the tower to supply un-interupted power in case of electricty failure. This generator produces enormous sound which becomes unbearable especially at night time when everybody is sleeping. Although there are no sound generating power generators are allowed after 10 PM but as this is attached to the tower, it swtich on automatically as soon as there is a power cut/failure.

    When the tower was installed, no approval was taken from the neighbourhood.

    A complaint was made in past to remove the tower but it was made de-function for few days before connection was re-instated and tower started functioning again.

    Unfortunately I do not have details regarding that complaint.

    As this tower pose major healt risk to children and old people continously exposed to the harmful radiations being emitted from the tower and noise pollution it spreads day and night, I am raising my voice through you to help us maintaining the healthy environment around us by removing this tower from the residential complex.

    Please could you look at this complaint and escalate it to the right channel for proper action.

    REGARDS
    ALL MOTI BAGH RESIDENCE

  9. #9
    Unregistered Guest

    Default water supply

    Dear Sir,

    It is submitted that i am the resident of Adyala Raod Rwp. We are facing great difficulties regarding supply water. On demand of water in our area, a water supply scheme was approved. and in December-2011 Ch. Nisar Ali Khan MNA had started the water supply for our area. But we are still facing problems for water availability.

    PUBLIC HEALTH ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT RAWALPINDI is the responsible for this scheme. I made a number of complaints in the office of Cheif Secretary Punjah through Compalint Mangement System, send so many emails to the DCO Rwp. but all are in sleeping mode. There is no movement for removel of my grievances of me.

    At last i come to your respected office. I request to direct the PUBLIC HEALTH ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT RAWALPINDI to take immediate action towards providing the water in my area because PHED Rwp is the main department who is not fulfilling its responsibilities. It creates problems/ huddles in success to take the advantage from newly installed water supply for the people of our area. It is the unprofessional and non seriousness of this department that after the opening of this scheme (since December-2011) from Ch. Nisar Ali Khan MNA, more than 8 months have been passed but the people of my area are living without water and they are forced to purchase water at heavy amount.


    The contents of complaints made in the office of CH.Secreatary Punjab are:

    Complaint Detail
    Track No. : 67557
    Subject : Govt of Punjab a deaf and blind govt (REMINDER-9).
    Complainant Name : Nadeem Alam CNIC No. : 37405-0653493-1
    Address : House NO. 12, Lane#3, Jerahi, Adyala Raod Rawalpind Complaint Date : 10/11/2012
    Time Limit : 25/11/2012 Time : 14:48:38
    Description :
    NFA.
    Already under process vide T. No. 65021.
    R/Sir,

    Kindly refer my complaint # 65021, 65477, 65095, 66256, 66458 & 6637. The required response from your side is zero. Should I provide copies of all of my complaint to Print/ Electronic Media to show your responsibilities and what efforts are being made by Mr.Shahbaz Sharif and his compainions for providing better facilities to the people of Punjab.

    I can also knock the door of our Judicisary. At that time please dont be blame tome to not inoform idol people like you within well in time please.

    Regards
    Nadeem Alam

    Trac
    67151
    Subject : Water supply. A long pending grievance (REMINDER-8).
    Complainant Name : Nadeem Alam CNIC No. : 37405-0653493-1
    Address : House NO. 12, Lane#3, Jerahi, Adyala Raod Rawalpindi Complaint Date : 16/10/2012
    Time Limit : 31/10/2012 Time : 08:59:56
    Description:
    NFA.
    Already under process videT.No.65021.


    Track No. :

    66920
    Subject : Water supply. A long pending grievance (REMINDER-7).
    Complainant Name : Nadeem Alam CNIC No. : 37405-0653493-1
    Address : House NO. 12, Lane#3, Jerahi, Adyala Raod Rawalpindi Complaint Date : 02/10/2012
    Time Limit : 17/10/2012 Time : 14:52:18

    The contents of Email sent to DCO Rwp are:

    FW: Water supply. (REMINDER-5)‏
    To see messages related to this one, group messages by conversation.

    9/12/2012
    Reply ▼
    Nadeem Alam
    To cmcomplaintcell@cmpunjab.gov.pk, dco@rawalpindi.gov.pk, sepherwp@yahoo.com
    Dear all,
    Pl Wake up

    From: nadeemalampk@hotmail.com
    To: cmcomplaintcell@cmpunjab.gov.pk; dco@rawalpindi.gov.pk; sepherwp@yahoo.com
    Subject: FW: Water supply. (REMINDER-5)
    Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2012 10:44:56 +0000

    Is there no one in Punjab Govt. to solve my problem

    From: nadeemalampk@hotmail.com
    To: cmcomplaintcell@cmpunjab.gov.pk; dco@rawalpindi.gov.pk; sepherwp@yahoo.com
    Subject: FW: Water supply. (REMINDER-5)
    Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 11:14:18 +0000

    PL WAKE UP

    From: nadeemalampk@hotmail.com
    To: cmcomplaintcell@cmpunjab.gov.pk; dco@rawalpindi.gov.pk; sepherwp@yahoo.com
    Subject: FW: Water supply.
    Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2012 06:46:08 +0000

    Still waiting for a response, wake up pl

    From: nadeemalampk@hotmail.com
    To: cmcomplaintcell@cmpunjab.gov.pk; dco@rawalpindi.gov.pk; sepherwp@yahoo.com
    Subject: FW: Water supply.
    Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 10:35:07 +0000


    Jinab Shahbaz Shareef Sb.

    Pl look the efficiency of your government, i still waiting for any reply

    Regards
    Nadeem Alam
    0300 5282287
    From: nadeemalampk@hotmail.com
    To: cmcomplaintcell@cmpunjab.gov.pk; dco@rawalpindi.gov.pk; sepherwp@yahoo.com
    Subject: FW: Water supply.
    Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2012 05:21:11 +0000

    R/Sir,

    RTM, It is once again requested to direct the PUBLIC HEALTH ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT RAWALPINDI to take immediate action towards providing the water in my area because PHED Rwp is the main department who is not fulfilling its responsibilities. It creates problems/ huddles in success to take the advantage from newly installed water supply for the people of our area. It is the unprofessional and non seriousness of this department that after the opening of this scheme (since December-2011) from Ch. Nisar Ali Khan MNA, more than 8 months have been passed but the people of my area are living without water and they are forced to purchase water at heavy amount.

    With best hope and regards
    Nadeem Alam
    0300 528 2287


    Complaint Detail
    Track No. : 66256
    Subject : Water supply. A long pending grievance.
    Complainant Name : Nadeem Alam CNIC No. : 37405-0653493-1
    Address : H No 12 Street no. 3, Jerahi Road, adjusent to Main adyala Road Rawalpindi Complaint Date : 08/08/2012
    Time Limit : 23/08/2012 Time : 09:27:45
    Description:
    NFA.

    Already under process vide T. No. 65021.


    Sir, This is in reference to following long pending complaints i.e. 65021 dated 8-6-12, 65477 dated 28-6-12 & 65095 dated 24-7-12, the solid response from your side is still awaited. You are requested to direct the Public Health Engineering Rawalpindi department to take action in this regard pl.


    Track No. : 65477
    Subject : Water supply.
    Complainant Name : Nadeem Alam CNIC No. : 37405-0653493-1
    Address : H No 12 Street no. 3, Jerahi Road, adjusent to Main adyala Road Rawalpindi Complaint Date : 28/06/2012
    Time Limit : 13/07/2012 Time : 09:48:51
    Description :
    NFA.

    Already under process vide T. No. 65021.



    Respected Sir,

    The time limits of below mentioned complaint has been expired but there is nothing done by the Punjab management. Is this complaint cell is just a show piece? or any action has so far been taken if complain registered on this site. June is near to end, there is acute shortage of water for the population of Adyala road, Khadim Aala Punjab is only issuing orders on Media but all of these are just wastage of time and Income Tax of poor people to this province. I am very dis-apointing with this attitude of this government



    hoping for best

    Regards

    Nadeem Alam



    Track No. :

    65021



    Subject :

    Water supply.



    Complainant Name :

    Nadeem Alam

    CNIC No. :

    37405-0653493-1

    Address :

    H No 12 Street no. 3, Jerahi Road, adjusent to Main adyala Road Rawalpindi

    Complaint Date :

    09/06/2012

    Time Limit :

    24/06/2012

    Time :

    14:49:34

    Description :

    The on-line petition received in CS Petition Cell is forwarded for appropriate action as per facts/merits of the case.

    I need your personal attention towards an important humanitarian problem. First of all I want to pay thanks to Chaudhry Nisar Ali Khan for opening of water scheme in Adyala road rawalpindi. But it is a true fact that water lines after that opening which was done in December-2012 is still dries. Please help us to start this scheme urgently, because its june and all of us need water very much. The people of Adyala Raod is facing great hardship due to non-availability of water. Pl ask to concern to start this scheme now.





    With best hope and regards
    Nadeem Alam
    0300 528 2287

  10. #10
    Shashi Pal Guest

    Post Compalani against Tata Docomo New Connection

    Dear
    Sir ,

    Good Afternoon,

    Here I am Shashi pal . and take new Connection of Tata
    Docomo as dated 21 -02-2013 from Sharma Communication , V.P.O. Ghanouli
    teh. & Distt. Ropar Punjab . i have submitted all prof for
    activation. but not activated till 15.02.13 and its after i submitted
    prof again as dated 15.02.13 and told me that my number activated as
    dated 16.02.2013. but not activated till 17.02.2013.
    Sir i have big problem regarding this connection.and no body help me
    like as ( Retailer - Ravi kant -09501986743 ) and ( agent- 8699761372. )


    Sir, Kindle request of you that please help me for that solve that
    problem.

    Thanks & regards,

    Shashi pal

    Contact no ( 09882368060 )

 

 

Similar Threads

  1. BSNL cases in Consumer Courts
    By Unregistered in forum Other Services
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 05-04-2013, 11:28 PM
  2. Fast-track courts punjab
    By Unregistered in forum Bad Response or Bribe
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 04-02-2013, 12:07 PM
  3. Shariat courts complement civil courts: Muslim board
    By Unregistered in forum Bad Response or Bribe
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 09-15-2010, 05:06 PM
  4. Requirement of Expert Opinion in Consumer Courts
    By RoN in forum Electronics Appliances
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 07-24-2010, 12:25 PM
  5. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 07-23-2010, 02:09 PM

Tags for this Thread