Results 1 to 1 of 1

DK District Consumer Court Judgment Jayalaxmi Vs Oriental Insurance Co.

This is a discussion on DK District Consumer Court Judgment Jayalaxmi Vs Oriental Insurance Co. within the Medical Insurance forums, part of the Insurance category; Oriental Insurance Company failed to explain to the insured the warranties, exceptions and exclusions. Its Policy said that there were ...

  1. #1
    Raviprakash is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    115

    Default DK District Consumer Court Judgment Jayalaxmi Vs Oriental Insurance Co.

    Oriental Insurance Company failed to explain to the insured the warranties, exceptions and exclusions. Its Policy said that there were no attachments and on submission of claim petition the Co. invoked exclusion clause. Court said - Exclusion clause not admissible, liable to be ignored because the Insurance Co. failed to prove to the court that they had explained all the exclusions etc. In the result Ms. Jayalaxmi is entitled to receive a sum of Rs.17,055/- towards treatment of Ureteric Calculus plus interest @ 10%.
    Please open the attachment for details.
    Attached Files Attached Files

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 07-23-2010, 09:36 AM
  2. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 07-22-2010, 11:21 PM
  3. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 07-09-2010, 04:55 PM
  4. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 09-03-2009, 12:04 AM
  5. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 08-31-2009, 01:42 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •