+ Submit Your Complaint
Results 1 to 3 of 3

The Srikakulam District Co-Operative Central Bank Ltd

This is a discussion on The Srikakulam District Co-Operative Central Bank Ltd within the Judgments forums, part of the General Discussions category; BEFORE THE DISTRICT FORUM CONSTITUTED UNDER THE CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT (ACT NO. 68 OF 86) AT SRIKAKULAM P R E ...

  1. #1
    admin is offline Administrator
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    3,017

    Default The Srikakulam District Co-Operative Central Bank Ltd

    BEFORE THE DISTRICT FORUM CONSTITUTED UNDER THE CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT (ACT NO. 68 OF 86) AT SRIKAKULAM


    P R E S E N T

    01. Sri P.Gurunadha Rao,
    President, District Consumer Forum,
    Srikakulam
    02. Smt. D.Raj Kumari, B.A.(Hons.), B.L.,
    Lady Member.
    03. Sri K.Siva Rama Krishna, B.L.,
    Male Member.
    Dated this the 19th day of March, 2009

    C.C.No.170/2007


    BETWEEN:

    Konchada Navya, aged 29 years, W/o.Satya Balaji, House wife,
    R/o.Main Road, Palasa Town, Palasa Mandal, Srikakulam Dist. ...Complainant.

    AND:
    01)The Branch Manager, The Srikakulam District Co-Operative
    Central Bank Ltd., Palasa Branch, Palasa.
    02) The General Manager, The Srikakulam District Co-Operative
    Central Bank Ltd., Srikakulam. …opposite parties.

    This complaint coming on 19-02-2009 for final hearing before us in the presence of Sri S.Venkata Rao, Advocate for complainant and Sri V.Krishna Chand, Advocate for opposite party Nos. 1 and 2 and having stood over to this day for consideration, this Forum made the following:
    O R D E R
    This is a complaint filed under Section 12 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 and facts of the case briefly are as follows:
    Complainant opened recurring deposit account with opposite party No.1 bank at Palasa and paid Rs.1,000/- per month for sixty months from 29-12-2000 and the last installment was paid on 22-12-2005. The said recurring deposit account was matured on 29-12-2005 for Rs.81,110/-. Complainant approached opposite party No.1 bank for payment of the maturity amount, but it was not paid stating that there was financial crisis. There is deliberate and culpable negligence and deficiency in service on the part of the opposite parties in not paying the maturity amount. Hence complaint is filed for a direction to the opposite parties to pay an amount of Rs.81,110/- with interest at the rate of 18% per annum and compensation of Rs.10,000/- and costs.
    2) Opposite party No.1 filed counter stating that the complainant had not approached opposite party No.1 bank for payment of the maturity amount and the complainant had not issued any notice claiming the maturity amount. It is further stated that the maturity amount of the complainant was placed in suspense account as per the bank practice.
    Opposite party No.2 filed memo adopting the counter filed by opposite party No.1.


    4) Both parties filed affidavits. Exs.A1 to A6 are marked on behalf of the complainant. Exs.B1 to B4 are marked on behalf of the opposite parties.
    Heard both parties.
    Point for consideration is:
    Whether there is deficiency in service on the part of the opposite parties.
    5) Point:
    Complainant filed affidavit stating the same facts as in the complaint. Opposite parties filed affidavit stating the same facts as in the counter. It is the case of the complainant that she approached opposite party No.1 bank for payment of the maturity amount and opposite party No.1 bank did not pay the same. It is the case of the opposite parties that the complainant did not approach opposite party No.1 bank for payment of the maturity amount and did not issue any notice demanding payment of the maturity amount.
    6) Ex.A1 is copy of pass-book. It is not denied by the opposite parties. Ex.A2 is copy of notice dated 6-8-2007 issued by the complainant to the opposite parties demanding payment of maturity amount of Rs.81,110/-. Exs.A3 and A4 are courier service receipts showing that Ex.A2 notice was sent to the opposite parties and they received the same. Complaint was filed on 28-9-2007 when there was no reply from the opposite parties.
    7) Opposite parties have not denied the recurring deposit account of the complainant and the maturity value of the recurring deposit. Opposite parties have stated in their counter that they deposited the amount in suspense account when the complainant did not approach them for payment. There is no evidence to show that the complainant approached opposite party No.1 bank at Palasa for payment of the maturity amount after 29-12-2005. Complainant issued notice dated 6-8-2007 demanding payment of the maturity amount and the opposite parties received the said notice and kept quiet. It is the case of the opposite parties that the complainant has to approach opposite party No.1 bank at Palasa personally and request for payment of the maturity amount. It is not proper to give notice and demand payment of maturity amount when there was no refusal for payment of the same. Complainant has not adduced any evidence to show that opposite party No.1 bank had refused to pay the maturity amount and that was necessitated for issue of notice dated 6-8-2007. There is no reason for the complainant to wait for more than one year seven months without issuing notice to the opposite parties bank demanding the maturity amount. It shows that the complainant had not approached opposite party No.1 bank at Palasa for payment of the maturity amount. We therefore hold that there is no deficiency in service on the part of the opposite parties bank. Hence we answer the point accordingly.


    In the result, complaint is dismissed. No costs. Complainant is directed to approach opposite party No.1 bank at Palasa and request for payment of the maturity amount. If opposite party No.1 bank refuses to pay the said amount then the complainant is at liberty to file complaint against the opposite parties for payment of the said amount. Advocate’s fee is fixed at Rs.500/- (Rupees five hundred only).
    Dictated to the Shorthand Writer, transcribed by him, corrected and pronounced by us in open Forum on this the 19th day of March, 2009.
    Regards,
    Admin,

    ** PMs asking me for support will be deleted unless I've asked you to PM me with additional details **

  2. #2
    adv.sumit is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    1,363

    Default Co-operative Central Bank

    Sri Gayadhar Jena, aged about 54(fifty four) years, S/o late Purna Chandra Jena, At/Po. Lalamba Dist. Bargarh-768102. ... ... ... Complainant.

    - V e r s u s -

    1.

    The Branch Manager, Sambalpur District Co-operative Central Bank Ltd., Godabhaga Branch, At/Po. Godabhaga Dist. Bargarh.
    2.

    The Secretary, Sambalpur District Co-operative Central Bank Ltd., Bargarh, At/po/ Dist. Bargarh.

    ... ... ... Opposite Parties.



    -: P R E S E N T :-


    The present complaint pertains to deficiency in service as envisaged under the Consumer Protection Act-1986. Its brief history is as follows:-

    The Complainant deposited a sum of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees ten thousand) only towards fixed deposit for a period of 10(ten) years on Dt. 10/04/1999 with the Opposite Party No.1(one) Bank on the assurance of the Opposite Party No.1(one) that the maturity amount would be Rs.35,942/-(Rupees thirty five thousand nine hundred forty two) only on completion of the maturity period of 10(ten) years. The Bank issued Fixed Deposit Receipt No. 004864 Dt. 10/04/1999. After 10(ten) years of the deposit, on advice of the Opposite Party No.1(one), the Complainant opened a Saving Bank Account wherein on Dt. 24/04/2009 the Bank deposited Rs. 23,000/-(Rupees twenty three thousand) only towards the maturity amount of the fixed deposit of Rs. 10,000/-(Rupees ten thousand) only made for 10(ten) years.



    The Complainant told the Opposite Party No.1(one) that the deposit being a long term one, it should have carried compound interest, the maturity amount totaling Rs. 35,942/-(Rupees thirty five thousand nine hundred forty two) only. The Opposite Party No.1(one) told the Complainant that it will not be more than Rs. 23,000/-(Rupees twenty three thousand) only and consequently the Complainant feels that he has been cheated by the Bank. Hence he prays for payment of compound interest over his fixed deposit in question and pay back the balance amount of Rs.12,942/-(Rupees twelve thousand nine hundred forty two) only by the Opposite Parties along with Rs.20,000/-(Rupees twenty thousand) only towards mental agony and a compensation of Rs. 5,000/-(Rupees five thousand) only.

    The Opposite Parties, in their version, question the maintainability of the complaint as the dispute is triable by the Registrar of Co-operative Societies U/S 68 of O.C.S. Act. They deny that the Opposite Party No.1(one) told the Complainant on Dt. 13/04/1999 that the maturity amount of the deposit in question would be Rs. 35,942/-(Rupees thirty five thousand nine hundred forty two) only. It is clearly mentioned in the deposit receipt that 13%(thirteen percent) interest per annum be paid to the deposit amount. The Opposite Parties contend that there are various investment schemes carrying different rate of interest and benefit to the depositor, as for example, in fixed deposit scheme simple interest will be paid on the fixed deposit amount monthly, quarterly, half yearly basis as per choice of the depositor and he (depositor) can withdraw the interest monthly/quarterly/half yearly for his use, but in cash certificate scheme interest will be compounded on quarterly basis on the deposit amount and maturity amount will be paid on or after due date. The depositor cannot encash the interest of the deposit amount before the period of maturity.

    The Opposite Parties also claim that the Complaint is barred by limitation as the Complainant has received the fixed deposit receipt on Dt. 13/04/1999. They pray for dismissal of the complaint.

    Perused the complaint the version of the Opposite Parties along with the copies of documents filed and find as follows:-

    The Opposite Parties rendering banking service and the Complainant being a depositor for earning interest from such services, the complaint is very much triable by this Forum under the provision of the Consumer Protection Act-1986. The date of maturity of the fixed deposit being Dt.13/04/2009 the complaint is not barred by limitation.

    The Opposite Parties take a denial plea that the Opposite Party No.1(one) ever told the Complainant that the maturity amount of the fixed deposit would be Rs. 35,942/-(Rupees thirty five thousand nine hundred forty two) only the fixed deposit receipt mentions “the sum of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees ten thousand) only as a deposit @13%(thirteen percent) per annum”. At a simple interest of 13%(thirteen percent) per annum the maturity amount becomes Rs.23,000/-(Rupees twenty three thousand) only. The Opposite Parties contend in their version “ in cash certificate scheme interest will be compounded on quarterly, basis on the deposit amount and maturity amount will be paid on or after due date.


    The depositor cannot encash the interest of the deposit amount before the period of maturity”. The case of the Complainant is that the Opposite Party No.1(one) told him that the maturity amount of the fixed deposit of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees ten thousand) only deposited for a period of 10(ten) years would be Rs.35,942/- (Rupees thirty five thousand nine hundred forty two) only. The Opposite Parties admit that in cash certificate scheme interest will be compounded on quarterly basis on the deposit amount and maturity amount will be paid on or after due date. The depositor cannot encash the interest of the deposit amount before the period of maturity.

    Admittedly, the Complainant has got the maturity amount deposited in his Saving Bank Account only after the maturity date of the fixed deposit and he has never encashed the interest of the deposit amount before the date of maturity. No wonder, he is very much entitled to receive compound interest on the fixed deposit of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees ten thousand) only made by him for a period of 10(ten) years, the deposit being a long term one and there being no encashment of the interest before the period of maturity which conforms with the bank's own cash certificate scheme.


    It is the bounden duty of the Opposite Parties to tender just and proper advice to their customers as regards the investment they make which fetches the maximum benefit allowed under their own scheme. The Opposite Party Bank by not doing so in the present case, has committed deficiency of service towards the Complainant. There is no reason to disbelieve the contention of the complainant that he was told by the Opposite Party No.1 that the maturity amount of deposit would be Rs.35,942/- (Rupees thirty five thousand nine hundred forty two) only. The Fixed Deposit Receipt also does not mention the maturity amount which would enable the depositor to know about such amount.

    In the result, the Opposite Parties are directed, jointly and severally, to refund to the Complainant Rs.12,942/-(Rupees twelve thousand nine hundred forty two)only, the balance amount as per compound interest on the deposited amount and cost/compensation Rs.2,000/-(Rupees two thousand)only along with 9% (nine percent interest) on both the amount chargeable with effect from the date of filing of the complaint i.e. Dt.04/05/2009 within thirty days hence, failing which the awarded amount shall carry 18%(eighteen percent) interest per annum till payment.

  3. #3
    Unregistered Guest

    Red face coplaint against co operative bm dash. barpali

    dear sir, am a account holder of barpali cooperative bank , and here the service we are receving from the branch is very horrable, mr dash bm of this branch, is such an irresponsable person an un orginised way he is running his branch. u just come over this branch and chk out from account holder how he is dealing.

 

 

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 10-06-2010, 08:46 PM
  2. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 02-06-2010, 04:57 PM
  3. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 01-10-2010, 10:42 PM
  4. Kolhapur District Central Co-op. Bank
    By Advocate.sonia in forum Judgments
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 09-02-2009, 04:53 PM
  5. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 09-01-2009, 02:02 PM

Tags for this Thread