Useful Information Customer Care Address Popular Judgments
FAQ Consumer Forum Reliance Karnataka Country Club Bajaj Allianz State Bank Of India
Court Fee Airtel Chandigarh Idea ICICI Lombord Andhra Bank
Where to file Complaint Vodafon Bengal Tata Indicom HDFC Standard Life HDFC Bank
Notice Sample Idea Uttarakhand Airtel IffcoTokio Icici Bank
First Appeal Consumer Forum BSNL Gujarat Reliance Metlife Punjab National Bank
Consumer Protection Act Nokia Rajasthan Vodafone SBI Life Insurance Bank Of India
RTI for Banks Micromax Assam Mobile Store Reliance General Insurance Canara Bank
Insurance Ombudsman Lava Uttar Pradesh MTNL New India Insurance Bank Of Baroda
Banking Ombudsman Karbonn Jharkhand Birla Sun Life National Insurance United India Insurance
How to start DND Sony Bihar LIC Oriental Insurance State Bank Mysore
Irctc TATA AIG India Bank


+ Submit Your Complaint
Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Director of Pension and Pension Welfare, Govt. of Raj., Jaipur.

  1. #1
    Advocate.sonia's Avatar
    Advocate.sonia is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    790

    Default Director of Pension and Pension Welfare, Govt. of Raj., Jaipur.

    APPEAL NO: 987/2005


    Nawal Singh Sancheti

    r/o Kapasan,Teh. Kapasan,

    Distt. Chitorgarh.

    Complainant- appellant


    Vs.


    1. State of Rajasthan through Distt. Collector, Chittorgarh.

    2. Director of Pension and Pension Welfare, Govt. of Raj., Jaipur.

    3. Financial Advisor, Medical & Health Services, Govt. of Raj. Jaipur.

    4. Treasury Officer, Chittorgarh.

    Opposite parties-respondents


    Date of Judgment 5.3.09


    Before:


    Mr.Justice Sunil Kumar Garg-President

    Mrs.Vimla Sethia-Member


    Mr.Manoj Kumar Sharma counsel for the appellant

    Mr.M.L.Vyas counsel for the respondents


    This appeal has been filed by the complainant appellant against order dated 17.5.05 passed by the District Forum, Chittorgarh in complaint no. 304/2004 by which the complaint of the complainant appellant was dismissed.


    2. It arises in the following circumstances-

    2



    That the complainant appellant had filed a complaint against the respondents before the District Forum, Chittorgarh on 19.10.04 inter alia stating that after his retirement as per terms and conditions of the service, free medical aid was being provided by the respondents and for that a trust was created by the Govt. of Rajasthan for the welfare of the retired employees. It was further stated in the complaint that the complainant appellant was a patient of heart and his case was referred by the Medical Board for taking the treatment in AIIMS at Delhi and approximate expenditure to the tune of Rs.50,000/- was sanctioned by the medical board on 5.2.02. It was further stated that thereafter on 8.4.02 the complainant appellant was got admitted in the AIIMS where bypass surgery was done on him on 10.4.02 and a sum of Rs.55,000/- were spent for which bill issued by the AIIMS had been produced which shows that the complainant had taken the treatment in that institute for the period 9.4.02 to 17.4.02. It was further stated in the complaint that thereafter claim was preferred by the complainant appellant before the office of the respondents but his case was rejected simply on the ground that the pensionary diary was not renewed. Thereafter the present complaint was filed.


    A reply was filed by the respondents before the District Forum,Chittorgarh on 21.12.04 and the case of the respondents was that the amount which was sanctioned by the medical board was to be utilised by the end of 31.3.02 and since the diary for the next financial year was not


    3


    renewed, therefore, the complainant appellant was not entitled to any amount and it was prayed that complaint be dismissed.


    After hearing the parties, the District Forum, Chittorgarh through impugned order dated 17.5.05 had dismissed the complaint inter alia holding that as per circular of the Govt. of Rajasthan, no claim for financial assistance was to be entertained unless medical diary stands renewed for the period the treatment was taken by the pensioner and since the diary of the complainant (pensioner ) was not renewed, therefore, claim was not payable.


    Aggrieved from the said order dated 17.5.02 passed by the District Forum,Chittorgarh, this appeal has been filed by the complainant appellant.


    3. In this appeal the main contention of the learned counsel for the complainant appellant is that the findings recorded by the District Forum by which complaint was dismissed are erroneous one as the amount of Rs.50,000/- which was sanctioned by the Medical Board on 5.2.02 was for the treatment to be taken at AIIMS, New Delhi and there was no restriction that the bypass surgery be got conducted prior to 31.3.02 and thus the findings of the District Forum rejecting the claim of the complainant appellant could not be sustained as they suffer from basic infirmity, illegality and perversity and this appeal deserves to be allowed.


    4. On the other hand the learned counsel appearing for the


    4


    respondents has supported the impugned order passed by the District Forum.


    5. We have heard the learned counsel appearing for the appellant as well as for the respondents and gone through the entire materials available on record.


    6. In our considered opinion, the findings recorded by the District Forum could not be sustained at all as no rider could be imposed on the pensioner that this amount be utilised before 31.3.02 especially when the complainant appellant was a patient of heart and as per case of the complainant appellant he had received heart attack on 2.4.02 and thereafter he rushed to Delhi where he was admitted in AIIMS on 8.4.02 and bypass surgery was done on 10.4.02 and thus the complainant appellant is entitled to get Rs.50,000/- though he had spent more amount.


    7. For the reasons stated above, the findings of the District Forum dismissing the complaint of the complainant appellant could not be sustained as they suffer from basic infirmity, illegality and perversity. Hence, this appeal deserves to be allowed and the impugned order is liable to be quashed and set aside and the appellant complainant is entitled to get a sum of Rs.50,000/- alongwith interest @ 9% p.a. from the date of filing of the complaint.



    Accordingly, this appeal filed by the appellant complainant is allowed and the impugned order dated 17.5.05 passed by the District Forum,Chittorgarh is quashed and set aside and the complaint of the complainant appellant stands allowed

    5


    in the manner that the respondents are directed to pay to the complainant appellant a sum of Rs. 50,000/- alongwith interest @ 9% p.a. from the date of filing of the complaint till the payment is made and respondents are further directed to pay a sum of Rs.3000/- as amount of costs to the complainant appellant.



    Member President

  2. #2
    Unregistered Guest

    Default Query Related To NO. 54 A OF Additional Pension

    Sir I want you to please Solve My Query Related To Rule No 54A OF Amount Of Additional Pension / Family Pension That the Additional Pension Available on Attaining Age the age of 80 What Clearly means, As it means on completing 80 Or at the start of 80 please reply me as early as possible

  3. #3
    Vimla Devi soni Guest

    Default Released my Husband Pension

    Dear sir,
    My husband Before worked in Heavy water plant anushaki Kota Near Rawatbhata Rajasthan .And he wewe retired on Year 2007.
    so, later on my husband death on Februry -2012 .


    we have already send All document including with death certificate Though Bank ( State bank of bikaner & jaipur KOTA BRANCH RAJ )
    Please ,let me now about my husband name Late.Sh. Tikam chand soni . so, we have already suffered so,many problems in my life
    how can without pension me and also my daughter . manage our life
    so,
    please request to you early as early possible you have check my all document in Jaipur Pension Office in rajasthan .and released my monthly pension .

    Thanks With Regards,
    Vimla Devi soni
    9950362929
    09099957902

  4. #4
    Bhairusingh Guest

    Default to restart monthly pension

    sir my mother smt kankoo devi didnot submit life certaficiate and hence her pension had been stoped.But now she had submitted her life certificate.Her ppo no is 621/1SR/FP/GUJ.please restart her pension.Thanks. She is taking her pension from SBBJBranch 1215

  5. #5
    vinod chandak Guest

    Default ruki hui pension chalu karwane.liye

    namste mam
    mera naam narayan chandak h . me sridungargarh ka rahne wala hu. mam meri pension chalu hui thi jisme mere father ka
    naam wrong likh diya tha . usko mere father nahi sahi karwa ya
    jiske baad meri pension aani band ho gayi
    waha tahsil(trajery) me pata kiya to unhone bola ki aap ka naam online nahi hua h to aap upar jake naam ko online kawaye .upar jata hu to bolte h naam online h or bolte h niche pata karo or niche jata hu to bolte h upar online ke liye bolo . is parkar wo mujhe paresan kar rahe h . mere ko about 1 mahina ho gaye chakar kate hue kabhi bole h aadmi nahi h operetar 5 din baad aana . so...
    mera old ppo. no. h 3939705 &my new ppo. no. is 4729915
    so mam i want to my pension .aap is mamle me dakhal de or ye kaam karwaye
    aap ki kirpa hogi
    thank u

+ Submit Your Complaint

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 34
    Last Post: 10-05-2012, 01:18 PM
  2. Admissibility of Pension Benefit.
    By Unregistered in forum Other Department
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 09-27-2012, 09:31 AM
  3. Can we approach the consumer forums for pension grievances
    By Unregistered in forum Suggestions and Feedback
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 03-30-2011, 11:52 PM
  4. Rajasthan Pension Medical Relief Fund,
    By Sidhant in forum Judgments
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 08-31-2009, 01:33 PM
  5. pension
    By Unregistered in forum Bad Response or Bribe
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 07-05-2009, 06:06 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •