Useful Information Customer Care Address Popular Judgments
FAQ Consumer Forum Reliance Karnataka Country Club Bajaj Allianz State Bank Of India
Court Fee Airtel Chandigarh Idea ICICI Lombord Andhra Bank
Where to file Complaint Vodafon Bengal Tata Indicom HDFC Standard Life HDFC Bank
Notice Sample Idea Uttarakhand Airtel IffcoTokio Icici Bank
First Appeal Consumer Forum BSNL Gujarat Reliance Metlife Punjab National Bank
Consumer Protection Act Nokia Rajasthan Vodafone SBI Life Insurance Bank Of India
RTI for Banks Micromax Assam Mobile Store Reliance General Insurance Canara Bank
Insurance Ombudsman Lava Uttar Pradesh MTNL New India Insurance Bank Of Baroda
Banking Ombudsman Karbonn Jharkhand Birla Sun Life National Insurance United India Insurance
How to start DND Sony Bihar LIC Oriental Insurance State Bank Mysore
Irctc TATA AIG India Bank


+ Submit Your Complaint
Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Golden Trust Financial Services

  1. #1
    Advocate.sonia's Avatar
    Advocate.sonia is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    790

    Default Golden Trust Financial Services

    State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

    West Bengal

    BHABANI BHAVAN (GROUND FLOOR)

    31, BELVEDERE ROAD, ALIPORE

    KOLKATA – 700 027



    S.C. CASE NO. FA/08/497

    DATE OF FILING: 29.12.2008

    DATE OF FINAL ORDER: 30.03.2009


    APPELLANT


    Smt. Sushila Pal

    W/o Late Santi Kr. Pal

    Vill.- Pursunda, P.O. – Paigara, P.S. – Khairasole

    Dist. - Birbhum



    RESPONDENTS



    1) Manager

    Golden Trust Financial Services

    16, R.N. Mukherjee Road

    Kolkata – 700 001

    2) Divisional Manager

    New India Assurance Co. Ltd.

    Madhusudan Apartment, 2nd floor

    P-18, Dobson Lane

    Howrah – 711 101, W.B.



    BEFORE : HON’BLE JUSTICE MR. A. CHAKRABARTI, PRESIDENT

    MEMBER : MR. A.K. RAY

    FOR THE APPELLANT : Mr. U.C. Jha, Advocate

    FOR THE RESPONDENTS : Mr. B. Mondal, Advocate (No.1)





    : O R D E R :


    HON’BLE JUSTICE MR. A. CHAKRABARTI, PRESIDENT



    This appeal was filed against the order dated 18.11.2008 passed by District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Birbhum in C.F. Case No.CC/40/0/2008 whereby the complaint was rejected at the stage of admission.

    Facts relevant for the disposal of the present appeal are that the complainant filed C.F. Case No.08 of 2008 which was dismissed for default. On the self same cause of action the present complaint was filed. When the complaint came up for admission hearing by the Forum below, the fate of the earlier complaint was taken notice of and the records thereof were called for and were consulted. It was noticed from the said record that on 17.6.08 though the complainant filed lawyer’s hazira but was found absent on calls as none on behalf of the complainant was found present. The case was fixed on 15.7.08 for hearing and on that date also though hazira was filed by the complainant but none was found present on calls. The complainant was asked to showcause by 18.8.08 as to why the case shall not be dismissed. On the next date also though OP2 took steps his Ld. Lawyer was present but due to local holiday of the local Bar the complainant did not take any steps and none was found present for hearing on calls. The District Forum was not closed and it was not holiday for the Forum but still the Forum instead of dismissing the case gave another opportunity to the complainant to showcause by 08.9.08 as to why the case shall not be dismissed for default. On 08.9.08 though the complainant filed a showcause but that did not relate to 15.7.08 and none was present for the complainant. Considering the above factual aspects and also the law decided by Delhi State Commission and another matter by the Apex Court, the Forum dismissed the present complaint.

    Mr. Jha, the Ld. Advocate for the Appellant contended that it is true that the earlier complaint was dismissed for default but in such case of dismissal on default of an earlier proceeding, the complainant does not get debarred from filing a fresh complaint on same cause of action. Mr. Jha contends that conduct of the complainant in the earlier complaint is not required to be considered as the complainant did not file any application for restoration of the earlier complaint nor the matter was considered by an Appellate Forum against dismissal for default.

    The Ld. Advocate for the Respondent No.1 argued. None appeared on behalf of the Respondent No.2.

    Therefore, the only point for our consideration is as to whether a second complaint can be entertained by a Forum when admittedly on same cause of action an earlier complaint between some parties had been dismissed for default. In our opinion the conduct of the complainant in the earlier proceeding is not at all relevant. Only thing to be considered is whether second complaint is maintainable in such facts. Law has been decided in the case of New India Assurance Co. Ltd-Vs-R. Srinivasan reported in 2000(3) SCC 242 wherefrom it appears that in such factual backgrounds second complaint is maintainable. The relevant observation in the said judgment is as follows:

    “This Rule is in identical terms with Sub-rule (8) of Rule 4 and Sub-rule (8) of Rule 8. Under this Sub-rule, the appeal filed before the State Commission against the order of the District Forum, can be dismissed in default or the State Commission may in its discretion dispose it of on merits. Similar power has been given to the National Commission under Rule 15(6) of the Rules made by the Central Government under Section 30(1) of the Act. These Rules do not provide that if a complaint is dismissed in default by the District Forum under Rule 4(8) or by the State Commission under Rule 8(8) of the Rules, a second complaint would not lie. Thus, there is no provision parallel to the provision contained in Order 9, Rule 9(1) CPC which contains a prohibition that if a suit is dismissed in default of the plaintiff under Order 9, Rule 8, a second suit on the same cause of action would not lie. That being so, the rule of prohibition contained in Order 9, Rule 9(1) CPC cannot be extended to the proceedings before the District Forum or the State Commission. The fact that the case was not decided on merits and was dismissed in default of non-appearance of the complainant cannot be overlooked and, therefore, it would be permissible to file a second complaint explaining why the earlier complaint could not be pursued and was dismissed in default.”

    As regards observation made in paragraph 17 of the said judgment we find that the same applies in appropriate situation when complainant repeatedly files complaints allowing earlier are to be dismissed for default only to harass the Opposite Party. In the present facts the same does not apply.

    Therefore, the impugned order cannot stand and the same is set aside. The appeal is, therefore, allowed and there will be no order as to costs.







    (A.K. Ray) (Justice A. Chakrabarti)

    MEMBER PRESIDENT

  2. #2
    ARCHANA KATASANI Guest

    Default Enquiry

    I will be paid on 05-02-2005 rs 617/- my code is 021907135
    how many years valid this insurance

  3. #3
    Unregistered Guest

    Default for insurance

    I,Manish kumar from west Delhi,wants for
    my personal insurance for 5 Lacs.I don't know your here working deligate's.
    my contact no-8506888492. and my email add-manish78511@yahoo.com.
    pls, get me what will be prem.amt. for that & how could i get it.pls sms it on my mob.no.


    Thank you,
    regards.
    Manish kumar

  4. #4
    Unregistered Guest

    Default Provide email address of Global trust financial Services

    Provide email address of Global trust financial Services
    on my email id - madhubal320@gmail.com

  5. #5
    devi lal Guest

    Post please sir return volue of policies

    Quote Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
    Provide email address of Global trust financial Services
    on my email id - madhubal320@gmail.com
    10000.00 rs plan me return 95000.00 rs wad hai

    please detail to goldon plan 5year 10000,per 3year pay
    return 95000,
    devi lal to return date of nov 2012

  6. #6
    arpandas587@yahooin Guest

    Default ECS/ NEFT problem

    Sir,
    My salary & commission has not been received till date,
    though i submitted my Bank account document for NEFT. My Bank account No. 0031013092154 (United Bank Of India, Nagaon Branch, (Assam).Hence, you are request kindly to make arrangement for NEFT.


    From
    Arpan Das
    Code No. 04-5446751
    Mobile No. 9401875200.

  7. #7
    Unregistered Guest

    Default Cheater

    is this company cheatd you also..???

+ Submit Your Complaint

Similar Threads

  1. TML Financial Services
    By admin in forum Loan
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 09-05-2012, 11:21 AM
  2. Chrysalis Financial Services
    By Sidhant in forum Loan
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 05-03-2011, 04:42 PM
  3. Golden Multi Services Club
    By Sidhant in forum Judgments
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 02-27-2010, 08:57 AM
  4. Indiabulls Financial Services Ltd.
    By Sidhant in forum Judgments
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 10-08-2009, 03:51 PM
  5. Bakliwal Financial Services India Pvt. Ltd.
    By Unregistered in forum Stock Market
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 06-15-2009, 10:25 AM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •