This is a discussion on M/s.S.S.Builders, a partnership firm within the Judgments forums, part of the General Discussions category; BEFORE THE ADDITIONAL BENCH OF A.P.STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION:HYDERABAD. FA.No.267/2005 against C.D.No.327/1999, District Forum-I, Hyderabad. Between: 1. M/s.S.S.Builders, a ...
BEFORE THE ADDITIONAL BENCH OF A.P.STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION:HYDERABAD.
FA.No.267/2005 against C.D.No.327/1999, District Forum-I, Hyderabad.
Between:
1. M/s.S.S.Builders, a partnership firm
Rep. by its Managing Partner Sri S.Santhok Singh
R/o.3-6-530, Lane # 7, Himayathnagar,
Hyderabad.
2. M/s.S.Santhok Singh,
Managing Partner of S.S.Builders,
R/o.3-6-530, Lane # 7, Himayathnagar,
Hyderabad.
3. Mrs.S.Sartaj Kour,
W/o.S.Santhok Singh,
Partner M/s S.S.Builders,
R/o.3-6-530, Lane # 7, Himayathnagar,
Hyderabad. .Appellants/
Opp.parties 1 to 3 And
Y.V.Balakrishna, S/o.Y.Vishwanadham
Aged 49 years, Govt. Employee
R/o.Flat No.2A, B.G.Apartments
Gandhinagar, Hyderabad. Respondent/
Complainant
Counsel for the Appellants: :Mr.Vijay B.Paropakari
Counsel for the Respondent Respondent served.
QUORUM:SRI SYED ABDULLAH, HON’BLE MEMBER
AND
SRI R.LAKSHMINARASIMHA RAO, HON’BLE MEMBER.
WEDNESDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF JULY,
TWO THOUSAND NINE
ORAL ORDER: (Per Hon'ble Sri Syed Abdullah, Member.)
***
No representation for the appellant since several adjournments. Notice sent to the appellants also returned unserved with an endorsement that ‘Party not found’. The appellants are represented by an advocate and he is also not appearing. Hence the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. No order as to costs.
MEMBER.
MEMBER
Dated 15-7.2009