+ Submit Your Complaint
Results 1 to 4 of 4

LG

This is a discussion on LG within the Electrical Appliances forums, part of the House Hold Goods category; Durgaram S. Naik, “Shubhada”, Tambdi Mati, Behind Dr. Gaunekar Hospital, St. Inez, Panaji – Goa ……………….Complainant V LG Electronics India ...

  1. #1
    admin is offline Administrator
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    2,967

    Default LG

    Durgaram S. Naik,
    “Shubhada”, Tambdi Mati,
    Behind Dr. Gaunekar Hospital,
    St. Inez, Panaji – Goa ……………….Complainant

    V

    LG Electronics India Pvt. Ltd.,
    Rego Bag, Bambolim,
    Tiswadi, Goa ......………...…..Opposite Party -1

    Wadji Enterprises,
    18th June Road, Panaji – Goa. ......………...…..Opposite Party -2

    Date: - 12/03/2009


    O R D E R

    (Per Smt. Shanti Maria Fonseca, Sr. Member)

    Brief facts of the Complaint:
    1.On 23.12.06 the Complainant purchased a refrigerator of LG make model No.326 TM from the respondent No.2. It is his case that within a short period of time the refrigerator unit started giving trouble.

    2.According to the Complainant he informed the Opposite Party No.2 of the same who in turn informed the Opposite Party No.1 who deputed their service mechanic to rectify the defects. It is his case that the mechanic deputed by the Company after carrying out repeated tests informed the Complainant that the unit was having a manufacturing defect and that the same needed to be replaced.

    3.It is the case of the Complainant that on reporting this matter to the respondent No.1 through the respondent No.2 the Complainant was assured that since the refrigerator was having manufacturing defect, the same would be replaced through the local dealer within 10 – 15 days.
    4.On going through the complaint, documents and all other evidence as placed before us by the Complainant we find that the Opposite Party No.1 vide letter dated 5/10/2009 has agreed to replace the refrigerator of the Complainant. In our opinion if the Opposite party No.1 has agreed to replace the said refrigerator then it also means that he is admitting that there is a defect in the refrigerator.

    5.We have also read letter dated 12.06.07, 27/8/07 and 17/5/08 from the advocate of the Complainant to the Opposite Party No.2 for which there has been no reply by the Opposite Party No.2. In the same manner despite service from this Forum the Opposite Parties remained absent throughout the proceedings and have been marked ex-parte as per Roznama dated 3/2/09 of this Court.

    In the light of the above, it is our considered opinion that the refrigerator provided by the Opposite Parties is defective and hence pass the following


    ORDER

    1. Opposite Party No.1 is to replace the refrigerator of the Complainant.
    OR
    In the alternative to refund the sum of Rs.18,600/- (Rupees eighteen thousand six hundred only) which is the purchase price of the refrigerator paid by the Complainant to the Opposite Party No.2 @ 12% of interest from the date of filing this suit until the date of payment.

    2.Cost of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees five thousand only) to be paid by the Opposite Parties granted to the Complainant towards mental and physical harassment and also towards legal expenses.

    3.Order to be complied within 30 days of receipt of this order.
    Regards,
    Admin,

    ** PMs asking me for support will be deleted unless I've asked you to PM me with additional details **

  2. #2
    admin is offline Administrator
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    2,967

    Default

    G.S. Gill son of Sh.Nahar Singh Gill, resident of 114, Vishal Nagar, Extension, Pakhowal Road, Ludhiana.
    (Complainant)
    Vs.

    1. M/s L.G. Electronics India Pvt. Ltd. Plot no.51,Surajpur Kasna Road, Greater Noida, U.P. through its Director.

    2. M/s As –U-Like Electronics, (authorised LG Service Centre), 642-L, Model Town, Ludhiana through its partner/proprietor.
    (Opposite parties)

    Complaint under section 12 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986.
    ….
    Quorum:
    Sh. T.N. Vaidya, President.
    Sh. Rajesh Kumar, Member.

    Present:
    Complainant in person
    None for opposite parties (ex-parte)

    O R D E R
    T.N. VAIDYA, PRESIDENT:
    1. Complainant had purchased a washing machine make LG WP 1022M from M/s New Mehtab Radios, Model Market, Ludhiana , distributor of opposite party no.1. Opposite party no.2 is authorised service centre of the manufacturer OP No.1. Complainant on 2.2.2007 had entered into a Maintenance Contract No.3031 with the opposite party no.2 valid from 2.2.2007 to 1.2.2008 by paying Rs.850/-. Under the contract, opposite party no.2 had agreed to repair the washing machine free of cost during the period of contract. During continuation of the contract in last week of Jan.2008, washing machine developed problem. Hence, problem was conveyed to opposite party no.2 but none came to repair the same. Then complaint was registered with call centre at Gurgaon on 28.1.2008. Thereafter, two persons Satnam Singh and Amarinder Singh came to the house of the complainant and told him that they will subsequently come to take the machine to service centre but none turned up. After waiting for few days, complainant got the machine repaired from G.N. Air Condition and Refrigeration by spending Rs.500/- from his pocket. As the machine was required for daily use, none has come to repair the same. Same is claimed to be deficiency in service on the part of opposite party, consequently claimed Rs.50,000/- as compensation, refund of Rs.850/- and payment of Rs.500/- spent on repair of the machine.


    2. Opposite parties in reply denied any deficiency in service on their part. It is averred that on receipt of complaint of the complainant, engineer on next day visited house of the complainant. He was apprised that the machine was to be taken to the service centre, and as such rehra was also sent to the complainant’s premises but the complainant refused to deliver the machine and insisted to carry out the job at his house. Then on 31.1.2008, Satnam Singh Service Engineer went to the premises and made machine fully functional to satisfaction of the complainant but the complainant refused to sign the job sheet. After filing reply, opposite parties did not contest the complaint and were proceeded ex-parte.


    3. In order to prove his complaint, complainant tendered is own affidavit along with documents.


    4. We have heard the arguments addressed by the complainant and have gone through the file and scanned the documents and other material on record.


    5. Complainant in ex-parte evidence has tendered affidavit Ex.CW1/A and documents. Invoice Ex.C.2 shows that on 23.10.2004 complainant had purchased the washing machine from New Mehtab Radios, Model Town Market, Ludhiana and had entered into Annual Maintenance Contract Ex. C.3 dated 2.2.2007 with opposite party no.2 by paying maintenance charges of Rs.850/- under receipt Ex.C.4 dated 2.2.07. The complainant had filed copy of the legal notice Ex.C.6 dated 11.2.2007 issued to opposite party no.1 alleging deficiency in service and thereafter issued e-mail Ex.C.8 dated 13.2.08. Opposite party no.1 then apologized inconvenience cause, due to not proper services rendered at their branch. They assured him taking proper action within short time. Qua this e-mail complainant sent reply Ex.C.7 . He has also placed on record receipt Ex.C.5 dated 5.2.08 for Rs.500/- of M/s G.N. Air Condition & Refrigeration paid as service charges to repair the washing machine.


    6. Complainant has proved his allegations by filing affidavit. Plea of the opposite party that the machine was repaired by their service engineer by going to his house is simply a defence of the opposite party without any proof thereof. In these circumstances, complainant has been able to establish that had entered into an Annual Maintenance Contract by paying Rs.850/- and the opposite party failed to comply with service contract. When his machine went out of order, complaint was lodged with opposite party but the defect was not removed. He got the same repaired from somebody else by paying Rs.500/-. By not repairing the washing machine of the complainant despite contract and receipt of money from him, opposite party have resorted to unfair trade practice and this act of opposite party would certainly amount to deficiency in service.


    7. Therefore, we allow the complaint and order opposite party no.2 to refund charges of Rs,.850/- to the complainant for not honouring the Maintenance Contract and pay compensation and litigation cost compositely assessed at Rs.1500/- for causing harassment to him. Order be complied within 30 days f the receipt of copy of the same
    Regards,
    Admin,

    ** PMs asking me for support will be deleted unless I've asked you to PM me with additional details **

  3. #3
    adv.sumit is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    1,356

    Default L.G.

    Mohinder Pal Prop. Deepak Iron and Steel Traders, Ist Floor of Shop no.10, Nanakpuri Janeja Market, Adjoining Street Sham Plastic, Gill Road, Milerganj, Ludhiana.



    …..Complainant.

    Versus



    1- Navrang Electro World through its Prop./Manager, Head Office B-XXX- 2707, Pakhowal Road, Opp. Nehru Sidhant Kender, Ludhiana.

    2- L.G. Electronics India Pvt. Ltd. through its M.D./Manager, Registered Office, Plot no.51, Surajpur Kasna Road, Greater Noida-2011306.

    ….Opposite parties.








    O R D E R









    1- Relief sought by the complainant, in this complaint under section 12 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, is to refund price of air conditioner, amounting to Rs.15,000/- and pay compensation of Rs.50,000/- for harassment and litigation costs Rs.5500/-.

    2- Case of the complainant is that on 11.5.2009, vide bill no.A-850 dated 11.5.2009, purchased LG air conditioner, manufactured by opposite party no.2, from its dealer opposite party no.1. It carried out warranty of 12 months. After installation of the air conditioner, it turned out to be of sub-standard quality, having manufacturing defect. It was not working, so lodged complaint with opposite party no.2, on its toll free number. Then representative of the opposite party examined the AC at the place of installation, but failed to rectify the defect.


    They, thereafter, failed to attend his complaints and refund the price, compelling issuance of legal notice dated 25.5.2009 on the opposite parties. After issuance of such notice, representative of the opposite party came to inspect the AC and again examined it on 2.6.2009. They then falsely stated defect in location and structure of the premises, where AC was installed and stated due to such reason, AC was not working.


    They further told that would be refunding price of AC and compensation for harassment to the complainant. As they failed to remove the defect, so complainant got installed new AC of Blue Star Company, purchased vide bill dated 4.6.2009 from Diamonds Refrigeration, Ludhiana. That AC is working properly and effectively. Then, opposite party no.1 was requested to refund price of the defective AC, but they refused to do so. Hence, such act claimed amounting to deficiency in service on part of the opposite party. Consequently, the complaint.

    3- None of the opposite parties contested the complaint, so they were proceeded exparte.

    4- Complainant led exparte evidence and stood heard through counsel.

    5- By way of exparte evidence, complainant relied on his own affidavit Ex.CW1/A, invoice Ex.C1 dated 11.5.2009, under which AC manufactured by LG Company, was purchased from Navrang Electro World, opposite party no.1, for Rs.15,000/- inclusive of VAT. Ex.C2 is the copy of warranty reflecting that warranty of 12 months on the product, was provided by the manufacturer. Complainant also got AC checked through Sh. Vinod Goyal, an Electro Aid. As per his narration, he inspected the AC of LG company, installed in the house of the complainant on 5.11.2009, by charging Rs.200/- and found it defective. As its vital parts of compressor and capacitor were defective.


    On starting of the AC, found that it was getting heated within few minutes of switching on and then get tripped and stopped functioning. He found no defect in the location or structure of premises, where AC was installed. So, concluded that it was having a manufacturing defect and regarding it, gave his report Ex.C10.

    6- Complainant has also sworn all his allegations that representatives of the opposite party time and again checked the AC, but failed to rectify the defect. Then, was forced to service legal notice Ex.C3 dated 25.5.2009 and also second notice Ex.C6 dated 10.6.2009. But opposite party failed to remove the manufacturing defect in the AC, or refund its price. Consequently, they would be guilty of resorting to unfair trade practice and committing negligence, by selling defective product on receipt of consideration, to the complainant.

    7- Therefore, complaint allowed exparte and as a result, we direct opposite party no.1, to refund costs of the AC Rs.15000/- to the complainant, within 30 days of receipt of copy of order and also direct them to pay compensation of Rs.1000/- and litigation costs of Rs.1000/-. Opposite party no.2 shall also be liable to comply the order, being manufacturer of defective AC. Copy of the order be made available to the parties free of charge. File be completed and consigned to record room.

  4. #4
    Kuldeep Singh(9876788287) Guest

    Thumbs down No customer support

    Dear Sir/Madam,

    This is to inform you that as I have already registered a complaint against my AC & the complaint no. is 'RNA110512031694' on 12TH MAY,2011. I was told that the ac will be repaired with in 2-3 days.But till now there is not any response by your service center.We have also contact with M/s M.S. Refrigrators,Ludhiana, contact person was Mr. Matwinder Singh Mb. No.-098140-17060 & Area Manager Cont. No. is 08054014155.

    We have faced major problem by your LG customer care.If you will not take any action with in 24 hours We have to go to Consumer Court.

    So you do the needfull as soon as possible & can be reply on this Email Address - ritesh.sharma195@gmail.com

    Thanks & Regards,

    Kuldeep Singh
    +91-98767-88287
    Kohara,Ludhiana.

+ Submit Your Complaint

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •