Shashikala D.
D/o Doddaveerappa,
Aged about 36 yrs,
R/at No.219, I Cross,
Teachers’ Colony,
Chandapura, Anekal Taluk,
Bangalore
…. Complainant.
V/s
01. M/s Air Deccan,
No.35/2, Cunningham Road,
Opposite to Canara Bank,
Bangalore – 560 052.
02. M/s Kingfisher Red Airlines,
(formerly called as M/s Air Deccan
And M/s Simplify Deccan) No.35/2,
Cunningham Road, Opposite to
Canara Bank, Bangalore – 560 052.
…. Opposite Parties
-: ORDER:-
This complaint is filed for a direction to the Opposite Parties to pay Rs.6,300/- towards missing baggage and Rs.2,50,000/- as compensation for deficiency in service, loss of reputation, mental agony and inconvenience.
2. The case of the complainant is as under:-
The complainant who is working in Human Resource Department at Narayana Hrudayalaya Hospital, Hosur Raod, used to often board the flights of the Opposite Parties for personal as well as official purposes. On 02/11/2007, she boarded Air Deccan Flight No.741 to return to Bangalore from Ahmedabad along with two others. On her arrival at Bangalore Airport, she found that her baggage was missing.
Immediately she complained to Opposite Party No.1 Air Deccan Authorities and it was brought to her notice by the said authority that the baggage was missing during transit and the same was to be traced. Thereupon a property irregularity report was issued to the complainant. In the said report, the name of Amaiakka B.K. is also included by the Opposite Party No.1 for easy identification of the missing baggage. The complainant also handed over the photo copies of the boarding pass, baggage tags and also gave the necessary information. As per the rules and regulations of the Opposite Party No.1, the claim with regard to the missing baggage is to be settled after the expiry of a fortnight.
The missing baggage was estimated by Opposite Party No.1 at Rs.6,300/- and the same was endorsed in the bottom of the property irregularity report. Opposite Party No.1 failed to settle the claim after the expiry of the stipulated period. She approached Opposite Party No.1 several times and she was assured by Mr.Rajeev, Mr.Shiny and Ms.Apurva – the employees of Opposite Party No.1 that her missing baggage is to be traced and if the same is not traced, the claim would be settled at the earliest. In spite of approaching the authority several times, the claim remained un-settled nor the missing baggage was traced. She issued legal notice dated 02/01/2009 to Opposite Party No.1. The noticed was received by Opposite Party No.2 which came into force on 29/08/2008 and therefore Opposite Party No.2 is also impleaded as a party to the proceedings. Neither Opposite Party No.1 nor Opposite Party No.2 gave any reply to the legal notice nor complied with the demand. Hence, the complaint.
3. On service of notice, Opposite Parties 1 & 2 entered appearance through counsel on 21/04/2009. But in spite of sufficient time granted, they failed to file the version. On 22/05/2009 when the matter stood posted for arguments, the learned counsel for the Opposite Parties filed an application for grant of time till 26/05/2009 to file the version. Finding that even as on 22/05/2009 also the version was not ready, the purpose of filing the application was to seek further time, the said application was rejected.
4. In support of the claim, the complainant has filed her affidavit. The learned counsel for the complainant has filed written arguments.
5. The points for consideration are:-
1. Whether the complainant has proved deficiency in service on the part of the Opposite Parties?
2. Whether the complainant entitled to the relief prayed for in the complaint?
6. Our findings are:-
Point No.1 : In the Affirmative
Point No.2 : As per final order,
for the following:-
-:REASONS:-
7. Since in spite of entering appearance, the Opposite Parties have failed to file the version and participate in the proceedings, the material on record has remained unchallenged. From the documents placed on record it is clear that on 02/11/2007, the complainant had boarded Air Deccan Flight No.741 for her journey from Ahmedabad to Bangalore and after arriving at Bangalore, she found her baggage missing and thereupon the property irregularity report was prepared and filed with Opposite Parties. The copy of the said report is also produced by the complainant, in which as contended by the complainant, the Opposite Parties themselves have calculated the amount payable to the complainant as Rs.6,300/-, in case the baggage is not traced. In this report, it is recorded that the missing baggage weighed 14 Kgs and the amount payable is calculated at Rs.450 Per K.G. and thus Rs.6,300/- is arrived at as the amount payable to the complainant in case the baggage is not traced.
It is the contention of the complainant that till 20/02/2009 – the date of the complaint, the Opposite Parties failed either to trace and hand over the baggage or to pay compensation as calculated on the property irregularity report. This contention of the complainant that right from 02/11/2007 the date of journey till 20/02/2009 – the date of complaint, the Opposite Parties failed to either return the missing baggage or to pay compensation in that regard has remained unchallenged. Therefore, the complainant is entitled to claim Rs.6,300/- as compensation for the missing baggage from the Opposite Parties. Besides compensation of the missing baggage, the complainant has claimed Rs.2,50,000/- as compensation for the deficiency in service and for loss of reputation and mental agony.
From the averments in the complaint, we are unable to make out that the complainant is entitled to such huge sum as compensation towards deficiency in service and mental agony. The complainant has not even disclosed the contents of the missing baggage to make it appear that on account of loss of such articles she has been subjected to mental agony. However, in view of the fact that for more than one year, the Opposite Parties have failed to settle the claim of the complainant, we deem it necessary to award a reasonable compensation to the complainant. In our opinion, it is just and sufficient if the complainant is awarded compensation of Rs.5,000/- . In the result, we pass the following:-
-:ORDER:-
1. The complaint is allowed in part.
2. The Opposite Parties are directed to pay Rs.6,300/- to the complainant towards missing baggage and Rs.5,000/- towards compensation. Compliance of this order shall be made within eight weeks from the date of communication, failing which, the amount payable to the complainant shall carry interest at 10% Per Annum from the date of the order till the date of payment.


LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Submit Complaint..
